<![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> @FlakJack: I'm with you. I don't really give a rat's ass about Arrington, but I have to take five for a sob break while I ponder what the WaPo used to be.

raincoaster

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> I've got a Waaaa Burger with Cries for Arri

Troll_2.0

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> arrington tries to act like these comments don't bother him but i seriously doubt that's true

sggrf

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> @michaellamb: I can't believe anyone IS left at Wired.

Peteski

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> i can't believe anyone left at wired has any balls, so that's the amusing part.

Could anyone really take MA seriously

michaellamb

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> Someone remind me why Owen is posting an ad per day for Sarah Lacy's new book?

Michael Arrington

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> Whatever. Most of the online information sources totally butter the bread, spinning complete crap into a shiny silver platter. I can think of a few good examples right off the top of my head. At some point, is it their fault or the readers for buying it?

Syndication deals are like partnerships with Cisco during web 1.0. Everybody does it.

Patricia2

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> Technically, MA doesn't really "invest" money. He spends it on nonsense. Look at his investment portfolio... it's a crater after a crater. Edgio? Omnidrive? Dancejam (lol)? Seesmic?

Getting a check from MA is like a kiss of death.

Major lulz!

Figaro

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> Dogster lol.

sumfunguy

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> As an entrepreneur, I don't seek any coverage from Arrington or TechCrunch because they are of no consequence to anybody who matters.

Ted Dziuba

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> Alleyinsider is fair superior to TechCrunch. That blog went from cover start-ups and being useful to being total crap. Not to mention MA is the ass clown of ass clowns.

Don't forget his investment in Dogster.

bernielomax

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> Wow, very professional.

Ian Bell

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> As newspapers flail about in an effort to gain relevance in the online-driven media world, they're making some really questionable deals out of desperation. However, if Wired thinks the Washington Post should have shown better sense than this, then they've been ignoring 90 percent of the business and editorial decisions the Washington Post has made in the last 15 years.

FlakJack

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> I'm in the camp that believes that Michael Arrington has no credibility precisely because he invests in companies --- often really bad ones like Omnidrive and Edgeio --- but he's also a terrible writer. He makes up rules as he goes along and seems to publish mostly gossip.

sggrf

]]> <![CDATA[Michael Arrington doesn't appreciate Wired's abuse of his ethics]]> wow, nice image doctoring...

Jeff the Great

]]>