[www.fbi.gov]

I'm certain the FBI will be very interested in the long precedent of providing internet safe-haven to sexual deviants by Wales on Wikipedia, and Wikia too for that matter.

WilliamMarkFelt

Here's a few emails:

-----------------------
(July 2006, from Xed to Wales)
Wales

[...]
I notice [..] the user
"Freakofnurture", a proud pedophile -
[en.wikipedia.org]

When managing an encyclopedia, it must be hard to
decide who is and isn't worth keeping as an editor.
Should it be the user who points out the projects
shortcomings, or the user who is a pedophile and has a
picture of a cock on his user page? For you, the
priorities are clear.

Xed

-------------
(August 2006, from Xed to Wales)

Wales

It is very disquieting that an owner of a website
would allow pedophiles who have bragged about their
proclivities to operate openly on their website.
What's more disturbing is that the said owner would
act in co-operation with a pedophile to harass a
critic of the site.

I request the following actions to be performed with
immediate effect [,,,]
1. Banning of self-identified pedophiles on Wikipedia
2. A public apology from you for knowingly allowing
such people to operate on Wikipedia
[...]
Yours
Xed

XedMac

Yep peeps like that make me wanna just ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Troll_2.0

Well, here's a thought - Marc Andreesen, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Steve Balmer, Jerry Yang, Larry Page and Sergei Brin, are all really smart guys, but you don't read about their incomprehensible, bizarre continuous fuckups in the pages of Valleywag. It's all more or less normal stuff with them.

Oh no, but not Moller and Wales. Nothing even remotely normal about them.

And to all you that think a snarky post like this is trollish - sometimes fair and balanced means you don't say what you're really thinking. And I know all you fair and balanced, mature, above the mud-slinging Wikipedia types, have had the verrrry same thoughts.

So there's an old adage about protecting your reputation with your life, as it's really all you have. Well Moller's and Wales's infinite hubris has really put the ole kyebosh on that. Valleywag is as viral as HIV, and with all these stories, then word of mouth, Wales and Moller can fuggetaboutit. They both are contemptuous of the Bible, but the Bible has some wisdom about hubris. Hubris is a form of stupidity.

OK, letterrrrr rip for how mean I am about NAMBLA Moller and fuck-Larry-Sanger-in-the-ass-with-a-rusty-sewerpipe
-Wales

WilliamMarkFelt

Troll_2.0

PS that pic of muller is hot

michaellamb

I've been asked to weigh in with my views on this, so here goes.

As one of the most public and ardent defenders of free speech and the First Amendment (remember, I was one of the very first to defend Don Imus, nationally, on-air), I have no problem with a kid seeing a picture of a dick or a tit. I really don't. Where the Wikipidiots and that entire ridiculous website/operation lose me is with graphic pictures of guys buggering each other without it being clearly labelled and controlled as an "adult oriented website" over which parents can control content via the Parental Control Toolbar, etc.

It's not up to the Wikipidiots to decide whether someone's child is ready to have the "dudes mounting dudes" or "the joys of tittyf*cking" discussion. It's up to the parent.

As for the kiddie porn images on Wikipedia, and the Wikipidiots who defend this as "free speech" - you have to be pretty far removed from civil society and its norms to ever try to rationalize such a thing.

Liberals are great at rationalizing things into mass societal regression. To wit: The $9m/year program in Canada to provide junkies with *free heroin* in a misguided attempt to *get them OFF heroin!* (A joke of a program started by the federal Liberals and hopefully soon to be ended by the now-in-power federal Conservatives.)

As people who have read anything I've written over the course of my career ( [www.rachelmarsden.com] ) can attest, I'm one of the least politically correct and most aggressive freedom of speech defenders in today's media.

What we have here with Wikipedia, however, from people (like myself and other with the misfortune of being included in this joke of a website against our repeatedly expressed will being constantly libeled by 13-year old Wikipedia "administrators", to a large segment of Wikipedia "community" (read: cult) members who believe that kiddie porn constitutes "freedom of expression", is a complete disconnect from society and its norms. This isn't progress - it's sociopathy.

I am considering a more in-depth analysis of this issue for the purpose of publication (ie. newspaper/magazine). If you're reading this and are an interested publication, feel free to contact me at rachel@rachelmarsden.com

Rachel Marsden

RenitaEleius

Troll_2.0

yeah, dookey breath, check the comments again, you big poopy eater!

WilliamMarkFelt

fedbait

Troll_2.0

Troll_2.0

Got something against Marsden?

"drinking soy milk early in a child's life increases the chance that they will become homosexual."

Mamma gave you a bunch, eh?

Troll_2.0

Hey, if the children wanted it, then it's OK, so what's the big deal? According to Erik Moller that is....

WilliamMarkFelt

ohnothimagain

So you get a resounding bitch slapping
here [valleywag.com]

So naturally, you decide to forget about it and move on to Owen Thomas now.

WilliamMarkFelt

One of Erik's Bro's?

Troll_2.0

TeenageCaveman

fedbait

ohnothimagain