<![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win]]> I vote for, "I don't think so!"

Fidel on the Roof

]]> <![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win]]> Is David Drummond possibly the best-looking Google executive? Imagine, hypothetically and non legal-actionably, that he were moonlighting as an exotic dancer. What would be his stripper name?

I vote for "Legal Thunder".

random_play

]]> <![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win]]> @BobDope: That actually makes a lot of sense. I'll look out for that.

Fidel on the Roof

]]> <![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win]]> I guess I'll make the obligatory quasi-racist Different Strokes comment.

matto

]]> <![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win]]> They're payin per comment the article draws. GaryVee will tell ya it is the only metric of a post's worth!

BobDope

]]> <![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win]]> You really get paid to make these posts?

Rehashing an article from 3 months ago acting like it was somehow confirmed?

How about the theories that MS would divest Hotmail, like they've done for properties such as Expedia in the past?

I sure hope Gawker isn't paying per post again.

WaggingValley

]]> <![CDATA[Microsoft-Yahoo failure is Google's first Washington win]]> Ballmer knew damn well that Google would fight him in Washington DC. Don't you think they've been hit with enough anti-trust crap?

No, Ballmer pulled out because Yahoo was too poison of a pill to swallow. It would have brought a LOT of pain to both companies trying to integrate.

OaklandTechie

]]>