<![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> @bloggerman: redo all the existing architecture in Ruby on Rails! That will surely be a Yahoo! Salvation.

matto

]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> Ah yes, the "too little too late" dismissal.

Thanks Desmond. I had forgotten to mention that.

Hey Owen, ever thought of actually asking Ari about what he's doing to deal with the "spaghetti" coding problem? You might actually get an interesting answer. Yahoo's being a lot more open about its plans lately to show that it's got a good viable non-Microsoft way forward.

Might be a good way to show your journalistic chops. And inform your readers.

bloggerman

]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> Since 26-Feb-08 does he even care? [uk.finance.yahoo.com]

Yahood!

]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> The heady plans are smart but have come too late.
-Des
[techwatch.reviewk.com]

desmondhaynes

]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> Maybe Ari is smart enough to figure this out. Valley Wag did, so how hard could it be?

There might be an effort to deal with Yahoo's "spaghetti" coding. Or some other way of dealing with the problems. You wouldn't necessary hear about it. If you did, you'd likely dismiss the whole effort as you do almost everything Yahoo does as hopeless, inadequate, etc. etc. etc.

It's really hard to take some of what's said about Microsoft seriously these days after dealing with Vista. It's not so much an OS as a POS. If they take over Yahoo it could be a massive train wreck that leaves Sergey, Larry and the head vampire over at the Goog in an even more dominant position.

None of the analysts or bloggers seem to think much of this through. They see dollar signs from a merger, and they're probably all using Macs.

bloggerman

]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> So, is this how Valleywag works? After a certain number of comments everybody's periods synch up so they're all PMSing at the same time?

raincoaster

]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> @ballmer: grow up you whiny bitch

Winston Smith

]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> @Bornean - that's a total pile of bullshit you piece of shit microsoft PR shill

ballmer

]]> <![CDATA[Can Ari Balogh "rewire" Yahoo? Probably not, but it will be fun to watch]]> Yeah, I think one of the reasons that Microsoft took so long with Vista (and this is just a theory) is because MS wanted to avoid spider code so they could deploy faster later on. That's why Windows 7 is coming so fast. True innovation can happen faster now.

Microsoft would take all the pomp and frills out of Yahoo and make it a well-oiled machine. I don't care if Yahoo! is all .net and silverlight a year from now, just as long as the devs can work and don't have room to make any excuses.

Business is about results.

Bornean

]]>