<![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know]]> Well, now that the results are out...it looks to me like either A) their financial gurus have no idea how to properly boost (in a manner of speaking) earnings, or B) They ARE boosting, but yahoo got hit pretty hard by the financial downturn in the economy, and advertising budgets. The market share loss can't be helping either.

DJCarbon43

]]> <![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know]]> I would do it this way:

[watchmojo.com]

ashkan

]]> <![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know]]> Wow, way to eat my post valleywag....

DJCarbon43

]]> <![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know]]> @Nicholas Carlson: Well if it were me, I'd use the currency markets.

Google's recent earnings boost was largely as a result of the weak dollar, and my understanding is that a greater percentage of yahoo's income is multi-national. A little repatriating of some of that international income goes a long way... arghh. Im actually in the middle of studying for an econ final...otherwise I'd explain more in depth. I'll try to post later Nick.

DJCarbon43

]]> <![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know]]> @DJCarbon43: We're all listening.

Nicholas Carlson

]]> <![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know]]> Hah. This is just the surface. There are far better ways to manipulate numbers, some of which won't show up for another Q or two.

I'm predicting 1.42 Bn.

DJCarbon43

]]> <![CDATA[Yahoo will make its numbers by hook or by, well, you know]]> Still proud to be an ex-Yahoo (not really).

Hopeless

]]>