<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:00:32 PDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:00:32 PDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5245438]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5231814">bbucy</A>: A la Ben Stiller? Well, I guess he still directs (a lot of crap)...Sandler too. Seeing a big SNL trend here. Is Chase directing these days?</P>
<P>Harry "wonders what Ackroyd is up to" Wang</P> <p><a href="http://www.rawhoo.com">FiveStarEggRoll</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[FiveStarEggRoll]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5245438]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:00:32 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5238981]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>"While the networks and studios all have subsidiaries producing content strictly for online distribution"... This content is almost 100% dedicated to selling the traditional studio offerings. Why in the world would agencies want to work around the studios to create content like this (as your paragraph goes on to suggest)? There is no comparison to what the studios are doing and what an agency would potentially want to do on their own (in regard to online content). The fact that studio produce online content does not mean there is anything in it for a ten-percentary. Jackson, have you actually been to an agency? They feed off the studios, they will never do anything to upset the master. I really wish my $13 bought actual news about the industry. This speculation is amateurish at best.</P> <p><a href="http://">WagCurious</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[WagCurious]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5238981]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:20:25 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5238567]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a good paper topic for my Alternative Capital Investment seminar next semester.</p> <p>gaynyernbama</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[gaynyernbama]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5238567]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:04:27 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5237688]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I was hoping you'd notice yourself, but since you haven't, the word "business" is also spelled incorrectly in the post. Just to let you know...</p> <p>BartKela</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[BartKela]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5237688]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:25:34 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5235216]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c5231814">bbucy</a>: Actually, I write on a promise pretty much every day.  Have you read the 'Wag recently?</p> <p><a href="http://www.jacksonwest.com/">Jackson West</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson West]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5235216]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:04:13 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5235040]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c5232827">CaliforniaCajun</a>: It's anti-Irish bias.</p> <p><a href="http://raincoaster.com">raincoaster</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[raincoaster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5235040]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:11:59 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5232827]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I would like you guys to get a Mac so you have a system-wide spell check that would catch things like...oh..."leary".</p> <p><a href="http://www.google.com">CaliforniaCajun</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[CaliforniaCajun]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5232827]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:28:42 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5231814]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Ferrell is just a freelancer who knows he could be a footnote in history at any moment.</p>
<p>As for the conflict of interest query re Morris and other agencies, forget it. Their current moves are just an extension of the "packaging" they've done for years.</p>
<p>Besides, dude, when was the last time you wrote something on a promise.</p>
<p>Get to La-La Land more often.</p> <p><a href="http://billbucy.blogspot.com">bbucy</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bbucy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5231814]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:10:17 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Hollywood talent leery of stock-option deals, but agencies enthusiastic]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/380699/hollywood-talent-leery-of-stock+option-deals-but-agencies-enthusiastic#c5231464]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>You mean "leery", right?</p> <p>BartKela</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[BartKela]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:380699:c5231464]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:48:41 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>