<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Jingle's free 411 service aiming for $175 million sale - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:57:07 PDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:57:07 PDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/377522/jingles-free-411-service-aiming-for-175-million-sale]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Jingle's free 411 service aiming for $175 million sale]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/377522/jingles-free-411-service-aiming-for-175-million-sale#c5442490]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>Actually they raised $73 Million and have little to show for it. Got decent traffic, something like 20 million calls. Tech seems like nothing but klugey off-the-shelf, easily replicated? and there is no "bidding" system for advertisers, so they apparently didn't plan for a Google purchase, or couldn't get it done? Besides, Google already did something with them and then walked and started GOOG411, didn't they? Brand name is interesting but maybe only worth $35-50 Million. Verizon's "1-800-The Info" just as good. Have they even proved they can make money on this model? Has anyone? I'm guessing they are at best zero gross margin, which isn't going to pay any overhead bills. And the service keeps getting worse, now no operators. (But 1-800-THE-INFO has operators and better voice recognition). They've had a lot of fits and starts, hiring then quickly firing, especially technology group on East Coast? Chief Architect left, not well managed in that arena? Might be worth $50-60 Million for brand and parts? This has got to be a HUGE disappointment given initial expectations.</P> <p>Tech_info_guru</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech_info_guru]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:377522:c5442490]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:57:07 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Jingle's free 411 service aiming for $175 million sale]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/377522/jingles-free-411-service-aiming-for-175-million-sale#c5253737]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I've had the exact opposite experience from you. Who to believe, eh? At least free411 offers residential listings.</p>
<p>Anyway, at least it'll be worth using this april, anyone who calls might win free plane tickets.</p> <p>slitbong</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[slitbong]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:377522:c5253737]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:57:37 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Jingle's free 411 service aiming for $175 million sale]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/377522/jingles-free-411-service-aiming-for-175-million-sale#c5253721]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that I've had the exact opposite experience you did? Plus, goog411 doesn't have residential listings. If anything, it's at least worthwhile to use it this april, they're having a plane ticket giveaway to anyone who uses it, at least once. Can't say no to free, hater.</p> <p>slitbong</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[slitbong]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:377522:c5253721]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:56:15 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Jingle's free 411 service aiming for $175 million sale]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/377522/jingles-free-411-service-aiming-for-175-million-sale#c5091953]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Ads notwithstanding, I don't understand the point of paying millions of dollars for an inferior service that's bound to lose customers over time as the alternatives get more publicity.  Two anecdotes:</p>
<p>- Every single one of the four or five times I've tried to use 1-800-FREE-411, its voice recognition has utterly failed to comprehend what I've been trying to say.  "Did you say 'City Deli'?"  "No."  "I'm sorry.  What listing?" "_Sushi_ Deli." "Did you say 'Sushi Jelly'?" "NO."  "I'm sorry.  Would you like to start over?" "_NO_." "One moment -- Let me connect you to an agent."  Which not only eats up a good 75 seconds with the initial ad factored in, but it still requires a human employee on the other end anyway.</p>
<p>- One time I was running late and needed the address of a business in a different part of town.  GOOG-411's voice recognition had no problem understanding what I was looking for.  "Here, let me connect you," it told me.  "Dammit," I said to my girlfriend, "I hope someone answers, or that their voicemail mentions the address."  All of a sudden, I hear the little gobbledygook progress sound on the other end of the line, and then the voice says "Let me get that for you."  Sure enough, seconds later I receive an SMS with the address and a link to a mobile version of a google maps page with the location of the business highlighted.  Their voice recognition is good enough to OVERHEAR ME BITCHING, FIGURE OUT WHAT I WANT, AND SEND IT TO ME.  And no ads.</p>
<p>So for a fraction of the cost of BUYING Free 411, Google could just buy more promotion for their own, vastly superior service, and steal Free 411's customers, taking away whatever ears would be listening to those ads.  Seems like it would make for much cheaper revenge...</p> <p><a href="http://www.launchcommit.com/">scurvyman</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[scurvyman]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:377522:c5091953]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:57:18 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>