<![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies]]> @MarkTheMarketWatcher: I suspect Microsoft will simply make life unlivable for the stragglers until they quit on their own.

True evil is keeping people around just to sate your ego.

Wabewalker

]]> <![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies]]> Good luck enforcing that non-compete clause, which are mostly illegal, if not enforceable.

QADude

]]> <![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies]]> Here we ago again...layoffs equal everyone in tears an VW covering stories daily of disgruntled employees

microserfin

]]> <![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies]]> That non-compete almost certainly qualifies as evil. I guess it depends on how long the ban lasts, though.

vulturesquadron

]]> <![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies]]> Yahoo! has promised, at a minimum, a 4 month severance package to anyone who might be terminated in the event of a Microsoft takeover.

So whose not evil, anyway?

MarkTheMarketWatcher

]]> <![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies]]> Is such a noncompete clause even worth the paper it's printed on in NYC?

matto

]]> <![CDATA[DoubleClick severance: up to four months' pay, if you don't go work for Google's enemies]]> Cool! Vanity Fair is covering tech! Look forward to their upcoming net neutrality feature.

transparency

]]>