<![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce - Valleywag Comments]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/valleywag.com.png <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce - Valleywag Comments]]> http://valleywag.com Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:06:54 PDT Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:06:54 PDT http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4929113 CNET Radio was great

eknirb

]]> 34:372625:c4929113 Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:06:54 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4910775 @joeduck: seriously!

Fidel on the Roof

]]> 34:372625:c4910775 Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:47:09 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4893613 CNET endured the first web boom, got its ass kicked and has repositioned and reinvented more times than Madonna. Nothing to see here.

Patricia2

]]> 34:372625:c4893613 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:12:46 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4890706 they should just sell news.com domain name..that should fetch them a pretty penny

yawnster

]]> 34:372625:c4890706 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:20:53 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4890560 CNET may be too good at journalism to survive the new media. They need to lower their journalistic standards...dramatically... to compete with ....ummm...Valleywag et al.

joeduck

]]> 34:372625:c4890560 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:08:09 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4890018 I haven't logged on to cnet since '96

Fidel on the Roof

]]> 34:372625:c4890018 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:24:37 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4888928 bugz321, sell the stock and forget about them

26footjasontaylor

]]> 34:372625:c4888928 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:11:20 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4888816 Thank Gawd. I've held that stagnant bongwater they call their stock for way too long.

bugz321

]]> 34:372625:c4888816 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:04:02 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4888135 This is what happens when you have a private equity investment banker (Neil Ashe) leading the charge, instead of an actual visionary product guy (how you are missed, Shelby). The various management teams there have sat by frozen and drunk on some belief that they are innovators, not listening to their own people and not having a clue what to do with what are actually great properties, while the rest of the net ran circles around them.

The recent fiasco with Gamespot's editorial integrity is the latest example in a long string of poor decisions to let clueless sales and marketing types take priority over the actual authentic and passionate voices that worked there - but then again, that is the corporate way.

Let us now watch the Jana Partners takeover attempt spur a sell-off of the various properties on their own.

skiddin

]]> 34:372625:c4888135 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:22:37 PDT <![CDATA[CNET lays off 120, 10 percent of U.S. workforce]]> http://valleywag.com/372625/cnet-lays-off-120-10-percent-of-us-workforce#c4886832 CNET has 1200 employees? No wonder they can't make money.

Guys, you're a media company about technology. You're not a technology company.

LongAgoYahoo

]]> 34:372625:c4886832 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:26:34 PDT