<![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers" - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers" - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers"]]> Shouldn't Tatiana the Tiger be on the cover of this book?

BartKela

]]> <![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers"]]> I dunno. Apparently a large percentage of iPhones are unlocked, and there may be some growing rebellion at Apple's walled-Auschwitz for iPhone apps. I predict sales of books like this will spike after the first big instance of Apple disapproving a useful iPhone app.

(But is anyone else tired of the animal motif O'Really uses on all these book covers? Granted, they're more tasteful than the typical computer book, but as a mnemonic device they ceased to function long ago.)

ifstone

]]> <![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers"]]> I like to see what they display on the cover. Plus I'm sure the book will have future use, like a back issue of 2600.

waynelambright

]]> <![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers"]]> Boy, I sure do miss the Stacey's in downtown Palo Alto. (sniff)

BartKela

]]> <![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers"]]> There's just something wrong with the big O'Reilly display at my local Barnes and Nobles

Claystil

]]> <![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers"]]> I remember back when O'Reilly books were actually useful.

matto

]]> <![CDATA[O'Reilly sells iPhone book to "hackers"]]> Easier but less profitable.

Tim Faulkner

]]>