<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Why one guy fled TED - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:49:45 PDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:49:45 PDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/366552/why-one-guy-fled-ted]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Why one guy fled TED]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/366552/why-one-guy-fled-ted#c4675185]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4660524">Bobberly</a>: Wow, Obama works in mysterious ways!</p> <p>smashface</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[smashface]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:366552:c4675185]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:49:45 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Why one guy fled TED]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/366552/why-one-guy-fled-ted#c4667318]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Arrington can have his spot?</p> <p>dalejo</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[dalejo]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:366552:c4667318]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:14:22 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Why one guy fled TED]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/366552/why-one-guy-fled-ted#c4660524]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>The source is spot on. As a long-time TEDster, I too am giving up. There was much grumbling this year from other long-timers who are feeling that $6k and four days can be much better spent. It's also gotten so hyper-militantly left wing that even the generally left-leaning crowd feels disconnected. It used to be that TED went out of its way to challenge the existing views of the audience. Now it's just preaching to the choir.</p>
<p>Oh, and a conference that used to be about real disciplines like technology/science, entertainment and design now features a lot of anti-rational spiritual and metaphysical silliness like a real live Indian swami taking our time to tell us that *breathing* through your nostrils is not only important, it's the key to enlightenment (sigh). I saw one attendee keeping a score card this year marking off each talk and whether it was actually about technology, entertainment or design.</p>
<p>Sometimes a session can seem like it'll be about science but then go off the deep end yet again. This year there was a brain scientist who had a stroke that impaired her brain function as it was happening. She told an interesting story about how it slowly changed her perception/abilities (like an acid trip) and the challenges this presented in calling for medical help. All good until she spent the last half discussing how this experience revealed to her a metaphysical reality she had never been aware of and that it shows we are actually all *one* with the universe (never once mentioning the  fascinating scientific fact that an oxygen-starved brain having a stroke can hallucinate metaphysical feelings that seem  incredibly real). At TED you can't even tell the scientists from the swamis anymore.</p> <p>Bobberly</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobberly]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:366552:c4660524]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:22:16 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Why one guy fled TED]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/366552/why-one-guy-fled-ted#c4655961]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>oh my gosh! vw just quoted an anonymous source. And they didn't even bother to point out that they had an anonymous source. suh-weet. New York Times - we're gunning for you, baby!</p>
<p>and, to boot, that comment was so insightful. really. it's not something you hear every day of the week from the entire Right side of the blogosphere or anything.</p>
<p>dude - sign me up to that anonymous source's personal rss feed, please. so hizzy!</p> <p>shmooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[shmooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:366552:c4655961]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:49:50 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>