<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer's letter to the Yahoo board - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:27:20 PST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:27:20 PST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/351498/steve-ballmers-letter-to-the-yahoo-board]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer's letter to the Yahoo board]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/351498/steve-ballmers-letter-to-the-yahoo-board#c4016463]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>"Depending on the nature of your response, Microsoft reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!'s shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value inherent in our proposal." <BR>Sounds like it's threatening?<BR>What can Microfoty do if yahoo rejects its offer again?</P></BR></BR> <p>ex_yahoo_also</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ex_yahoo_also]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:351498:c4016463]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:27:20 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer's letter to the Yahoo board]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/351498/steve-ballmers-letter-to-the-yahoo-board#c4009470]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>"It is our view that Microsoft has significant potential upside given the continued solid growth in our core businesses, the recent launch of Windows Vista"</p>
<p>Heee</p> <p>BobDope</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[BobDope]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:351498:c4009470]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:36:34 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer's letter to the Yahoo board]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/351498/steve-ballmers-letter-to-the-yahoo-board#c3997654]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Reposting here...</p>
<p>Holy crap. This takeover (and I use takeover versus Merger) will be interesting if it happens.</p>
<p>On one hand you have a bunch of useless BSD/php/c++ old lazy farts that can't develop worth shit who will end up being bitch boys to bosses that are going to be doing .NET everywhere. LOL.</p>
<p>Dear MSFT, as part of this takeover, please extend all takeover courtesies that Yahoo has traditionally extended to companies that it bought out. In other words, please do the best you can in ultimately creating the most fvcked up experience that you can possibly imagine so that the rest of Yahoo knows how miserable an acquisition can be for an acquiree....</p>
<p>I have a few examples of how you can realize this, as I have exemplary experience from Yahoo:</p>
<p>1)Put 20-25% of the proceeds from this takeover into an escrow account, "just in case you need to settle any legal issues".. Tell Yahoo employees that they'll get this money back, but make sure you tax them for it as income. Wait until the next year, and than get your lawyers to send off an obfuscated email informing employees that "sorry, due to increased legal expenses, you won't be getting shit back...And BTW, you're on you own to redo your taxes from last year." Don't screw ex-Musicmatch, ex-Overture, or any other ex-acquired company that Yahoo had already graciously extended this favor to.</p>
<p>2)Buy a competing company, like AOL, while you're at it...Then pin each company against each other. Better yet, get a General Manager from AOL and have it oversee BOTH the AOL and Yahoo acquisition, ensuring the GM from AOL says "I will be impartial." While Yahoo may be ahead of AOL, make sure you put someone really incompetent from AOL to oversee this effort.</p>
<p>3)In the pursuit of (2), when smart heads start to voluntarily leave because of the frustation, hust ignore them. After all, they are the most capable people and can find positions anywhere else. Who needs them right?</p>
<p>4)As the frustration mounts at the Yahoo side, and more people start to complain....Do your best to try to retain your C-,D-,F+ employees that haven't left already because they are otherwise unemployable elsewhere. Offer them lots of "retention bonuses" every 6 months, piles of worthless stock options that better function as toilet paper, and RSU's that take 4+years to vest.</p>
<p>5)At the heat of the frustration, remove the General Manager from AOL, and find the most F- manager you can from what remains at to be previously Yahoo. Make that F- manager in charge of both former AOL and Yahoo operations.</p>
<p>6) Ignore the "natural" turnover that will happen at the AOL side of the house. You don't need all the "A" players that leave from the AOL side anyway.</p>
<p>7) As the frustration mounts at the AOL side, and more people start to complain, so your best to try to retain your C-,D-,F+ employees from AOL side, that haven't left already because they are otherwise unemployable elsewhere. Offer them lots of "retention bonuses" every 6 months, piles of worthless stock options that better function as toilet paper, and RSU's that take 4+years to vest.</p>
<p>8)Finally with both sides are completely unhappy, take AOL's offerings and declare that that is the new MSFT offerings moving forward...End of life all offerings from Yahoo that are similar. It doesn't matter that the Yahoo offerings might have been built better, of had more customers. Do the most illogical thing you can think of by end-of-life-ing the better products..</p>
<p>9) Then spend millions and millions of dollars trying to migrate customers from Yahoo to the AOL products. Spend R&amp;D, engineering, product management $$$$ to make those AOL products up to what Yahoo products were THREE YEARS AGO, ensuring older Yahoo customers they will have "improved features and experiences".</p>
<p>10)After shutting down all of Yahoo products, rather than canning the Yahoo employees, assign them to some other business unit that was completely unrelated to what they've done in the past, such as Hotmail.</p> <p>ex_yhoo_music</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ex_yhoo_music]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:351498:c3997654]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:59:29 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>