<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Is Plaxo ready to sell to Facebook? - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:11:41 PST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:11:41 PST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Is Plaxo ready to sell to Facebook?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3732701]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I'd heard a comcast acquisition of Plaxo was all but done -- that these discussions have been going on for months.</P> <p>scottwired</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottwired]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:340451:c3732701]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:11:41 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Is Plaxo ready to sell to Facebook?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3569025]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3568960">DaveMcClure500Hats</A>: Yes, I realize that was a slip of the tongue :) Perhaps Owen purposefully baited you by suggesting Facebook's private valuation could give it a currency?</P>
<P>Even if I do make it to San Diego, do not expect me to be introduced by my VW identity. I am just one politically incorrect ScalaWag who can go without extra attention - refer to my prior comment.</P>
<P>Finally, I agree with all your points on valuations.</P> <p>ScalaWag</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ScalaWag]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:340451:c3569025]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:52:58 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Is Plaxo ready to sell to Facebook?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3568960]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@scalawag: please don't misinterpret my remarks.</p>
<p>i didn't say *they* were the fools, and the 'fool' reference was to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigger_fool_theory">'Greater Fool theory'</a>... in other words, Ballmer &amp; LKS are betting that *other* people will place an even higher valuation on FB in the future.</p>
<p>to be honest, i think they're probably right. but anyone with a unbiased perspective would have a hard time saying Microsoft wasn't incredibly motivated. not sure what the story was with LKS, but he's been up &amp; down the rollercoaster before.</p>
<p>personally, i think the rational # is probably more like $5-10B at the moment.  but give them another year or two of growth &amp; some improved monetization, and they'll be punching thru the $15B number no problem.</p>
<p>(there, good enough to earn me back my 'Silicon Valley Tool' moniker?  if not, please come to <a href="http://conferences.oreilly.com/gspwest">my conference</a> where i'll be kissing up to multiple social network platform vendors all at the same time ;)</p> <p><a href="http://500hats.typepad.com">DaveMcClure500Hats</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveMcClure500Hats]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:340451:c3568960]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:56:40 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Is Plaxo ready to sell to Facebook?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3568625]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3568567">DaveMcClure500Hats</A>: Whoa, Dave. You just stated that M$FT and the Hong Kong dude are fools for buying into Facebook? Careful with your words, brother. That is if you still want to do business in this town :)</P> <p>ScalaWag</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ScalaWag]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:340451:c3568625]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:30:55 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Is Plaxo ready to sell to Facebook?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3568567]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>my point is there's an inherent discount to deals done with inflated *private* stock... not so with "inflated" public stock, since it's equally convertible to cash.</p>
<p>so that $15B "valuation" isn't the same as a public market cap.</p>
<p>thus, less incentive to do acquisitions *just* for the sake of diversifying revenue, which is arguably what eBay has been doing for the past 3-4 years.</p>
<p>FB has a tougher job convincing would be target acquisitions that its paper is worth $15B until it's either public, or some greater # of fools buy into the current private valuation.</p> <p><a href="http://500hats.typepad.com">DaveMcClure500Hats</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveMcClure500Hats]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:340451:c3568567]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:15:09 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Is Plaxo ready to sell to Facebook?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3565294]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3562803">DaveMcClure500Hats</a>: Nonsense. Private companies can and do use stock for acquisitions all the time. It is a fair question whether the acquired company will accept the acquirer's paper, but it's far from impossible.</p> <p><a href="http://www.valleywag.com/">Owen Thomas</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:340451:c3565294]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:22:33 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Is Plaxo ready to sell to Facebook?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/340451/is-plaxo-ready-to-sell-to-facebook#c3562803]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;But Facebook's lofty $15 billion valuation gives it a currency for acquisitions.</p>
<p>gotta disagree there owen.</p>
<p>when you're PUBLICLY valued for ridiculous prices, then you can go on buying sprees because people are buying your stock for cash.</p>
<p>when you're PRIVATELY valued thru the nose, you can only go on buying sprees for however much cash you have on-hand.  which isn't to say that $300M is chump change, but you can only buy 2 or 3 Plaxos, not 10 of them.</p>
<p>dunno about the rest of that soap opera you've got up there, but i gotta think Plaxo is worth more to some big dumb old DinosaurCo who will pay up to figure out social networking &amp; take the 10-30M accounts at face value, rather than Facebook who already knows it inside out &amp; has 150M accounts of their own.</p> <p><a href="http://500hats.typepad.com">DaveMcClure500Hats</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveMcClure500Hats]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:340451:c3562803]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:26:27 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>