<![CDATA[Fortune.com redesign rips off Portfolio.com - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Fortune.com redesign rips off Portfolio.com - Valleywag Comments]]> <![CDATA[Fortune.com redesign rips off Portfolio.com]]> Oh NO! You surely screwed the pooch! Portfolio has a patent on all things Black and orange!!

Seriously... nothing alike. If you ask me, Portfolio has ripped Fortune. I mean, come on, Fortune has been around for how long now?? And from what I can see, they've taken their magazine and extended it's look online (finally).

Dude... find something good to write about...

Choochoo

]]> <![CDATA[Fortune.com redesign rips off Portfolio.com]]> Please. Neutral boxes and black text with a banner? I think you just described a few dozen blog templates. Neither site has any unique design elements.

With a headline as pejorative as this one, I was expecting a lot more.

BlueEyedMonster

]]> <![CDATA[Fortune.com redesign rips off Portfolio.com]]> I don't get how that's a ripoff. What, they both have black banners?

Jordan Golson

]]> <![CDATA[Fortune.com redesign rips off Portfolio.com]]> They don't really look that much alike.

your creepy uncle

]]> <![CDATA[Fortune.com redesign rips off Portfolio.com]]> this is such a tired story line. newsflash...design of internet content destinations is maturing, and converging. we get it. everyone is copying everybody. what bastards. duh.

all that being said, looking at these two sites, i don't even see this case as worth the story. i don't think these two sites look anywhere enough alike to merit a rip-off story.

oh, valleywag...can you please dig up a few redlined PR emails to post and leave stories like this to the diggers.

ROIpositive

]]>