<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Google's sexism - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 May 2007 17:48:51 PDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 May 2007 17:48:51 PDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/googles-sexism-260721.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Google's sexism]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/googles-sexism-260721.php#c1470948]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1470393">fatbastard</a>: Google has a heuristic based on statistics.  Natural language search doesn't work yet.</p>
<p>
It's almost like you're responding to the current state of first person shooter AIs by saying that when loaded into a mech, they don't work well.  Take these things out of the sandbox they usually play in and they'll fail.</p> <p>sample032</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[sample032]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:260721:c1470948]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 May 2007 17:48:51 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Google's sexism]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/googles-sexism-260721.php#c1470393]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Just goes to show that Google hasn't cracked the search nut like most pundits believe. A natural language search engine wouldn't react in this manner.</p> <p>fatbastard</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[fatbastard]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:260721:c1470393]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 May 2007 16:02:53 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Google's sexism]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/googles-sexism-260721.php#c1470278]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This brings up the MIT sexism question again: if men do in fact invent more things, is it sexist to suggest that "she invents" is a typo?</p>
<p>
And of course, the irony: feminists are critical of stereotypes and statistics that they women are bad at math, but instead of proving this WITH statistics, they invoke equality.</p> <p>sample032</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[sample032]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:260721:c1470278]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 May 2007 15:43:27 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Google's sexism]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/googles-sexism-260721.php#c1469963]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
"It's the world that's sexist; we just index it."</p>
<p>
Its actually a serious argument.  To do otherwise is a slippery slope, is it not?  Solving for content problems by tweaking the search engine/index is just putting lipstick on a pig.</p> <p>ROIpositive</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ROIpositive]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:260721:c1469963]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 May 2007 14:57:36 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>