<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Another AOL rip-off - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 19:47:11 PDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 19:47:11 PDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/another-aol-rip+off-257374.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Another AOL rip-off]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/another-aol-rip+off-257374.php#c1399909]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
There's no difference in implementation I notice between this execution and millions of other AdSense for Search design I see. And I wouldn't be surprised if Google actually direct their enterprise customers to model the look & feel of their SERPs after Google's own - something that's proven to be highly tuned for monetization. I hear AOL's search deal with Google has proven to be very successful and they're making healthy contribution to their bottom line so it must be working as intended.</p> <p><a href="http://www.soxiam.com">soxiam</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[soxiam]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:257374:c1399909]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 19:47:11 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Another AOL rip-off]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/another-aol-rip+off-257374.php#c1398477]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
After sitting through today's "AOL Management Update" and discussing it with the folks in my pod farm I am left with the following thoughts - </p>
<p>
 - Randy will be as relevant to AOL's future as he has been in the last 6 months.  I am sure Mary is really looking forward to that new child care facility.</p>
<p>
 - Randy & Ron think every AOL product or initiative is shit and that they are in the process of "turning it around".</p>
<p>
 - Ron insults everything and everyone.  I doubt he even knows he is doing it (Want proof? I will splice together a "best of" from the video of today's meeting).</p>
<p>
 - "Baseline" or "level set" is Randy's way of saying copy Yahoo! or copy Google.  Ron just says "copy Yahoo!" or "copy Google".</p>
<p>
 - AOL does have some talent in the senior ranks.  The rest, past and present, are megalomaniacs as discussed in previous VW posts.</p>
<p>
 - Nisha seemed competent and sincere.</p>
<p>
 - Kevin now knows that lying to an audience makes your mouth dry.  I am surprised that Ron didn't warn you.</p>
<p>
 - Wilson is a freak, but if you put all the AOL execs in thunderdome he alone would emerge victorious.</p>
<p>
 - I must be as stupid as Ron thinks all AOL employees are if I continue to stick around. </p>
<p>
And lastly,</p>
<p>
 - Ron reads VW, Hi!</p> <p>WillCode4Coffee</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[WillCode4Coffee]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:257374:c1398477]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 15:49:28 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Another AOL rip-off]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/another-aol-rip+off-257374.php#c1395668]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
AOL == Cockroach</p> <p>Whocares</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whocares]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:257374:c1395668]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 10:32:29 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Another AOL rip-off]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/another-aol-rip+off-257374.php#c1394310]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I don't see this as a rip off so much this time, but as further evidence that AOL's "human computer," and associated "system," excels at the science of poor algorithmic selection: </p>
<p>
aol> echo "creativity" > /dev/null</p>
<p>
</p> <p>stupindus</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[stupindus]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:257374:c1394310]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 08:04:56 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Another AOL rip-off]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/another-aol-rip+off-257374.php#c1393969]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Google owns 5% of AOL, so is this a big deal?</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/twaol_expanded.html">http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/twaol_expanded.html</...</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.stirr.net">Sean Ness</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Ness]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:257374:c1393969]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 07:28:53 PDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>