<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[The natural language of Powerset - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:33:58 PST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:33:58 PST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/hype-watch/the-natural-language-of-powerset-235329.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The natural language of Powerset]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/hype-watch/the-natural-language-of-powerset-235329.php#c954098]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
it does make me wonder about the role of the blogosphere in reporting. we heard about powerset a few months ago - the google killer. got it. now they buy some ip. google has one foot in the grave. got it.</p>
<p>
it's just so much like the MSM and how Russert and co just repeat whatever the white house and GOP talking points for that day are.</p>
<p>
doesn't "natural language" deserve at least a _little_ bit of skepticism, since, you know, nobody's been able to do it yet?</p> <p>shmooth</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[shmooth]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:235329:c954098]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:33:58 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>