<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[The Times bows to Google - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:51:53 PST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:51:53 PST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/the-times-bows-to-google-214752.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[The Times bows to Google]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/notag/the-times-bows-to-google-214752.php#c631189]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This scaremonger post is bullshit. A reporter is looking for an answer to a question, not necessarily always playing gotcha with a company or trying to write down how many times you can hear a flack say no comment. Sending topics in advance is perfectly legit, even if it's not ideal. The answers are what matters. </p> <p>Spit</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spit]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:214752:c631189]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:51:53 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>