Why is anyone still paying attention to Wikileaks? A month after John Young aka Cryptome published the prelaunch email list for the proposed confidential document clearinghouse, Reuters runs yet another story prompted by an anonymous informant. According to the Reuters source, this was all part of the master plan, and the interest in Wikileaks' credibility void only proves the necessity of its existence. (Figure that one out.) Given the Wikileakers' brazen hype and relentless pursuit of millions of dollars to fund the site, questions naturally arise about their supposed activist street cred, not to mention an increasing fishy scam-stench. How do you spend millions on a wiki, anyway?