SAN FRANCISCO, 3:11 AM, FRI MAY 16 | 37 POSTS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS | tips@valleywag.com | SUBMIT A TIP | RSS

Digg close to a $300 million sale?

Jay Adelson and Kevin RoseDigg is close to announcing its sale to a major media player for $300 million to $400 million, according to sources close to the company, I hear. When I floated this Digg rumor past some knowledgeable friends, several scoffed: "When isn't Digg up for sale?" It's true: The news-discussion site is perpetually in talks — but we hear the price tag always sinks potential deals before they're consummated. CBS, for example, backed off, with effervescent dealmaker Quincy Smith citing the media company's bubbly $280 million purchase of Last.fm as the reason it couldn't bid a high price for Digg. Things are different now, though.

Digg recently inked a $100 million, multiyear ad deal with Microsoft. On those revenues alone, Digg's acquirers could easily justify a $300 million to $400 million purchase price; if Microsoft is paying about $30 million a year for Digg's banner-ad inventory, paying that price would mean a modest 10x to 13x multiple on revenues.

So who is it? A source rules out all the big Internet players — not Microsoft, not Google, not Yahoo. CBS, a big Web acquirer of late, has taken itself out of the running. So who could it be?

Two possibilities: The New York Times Co. and the Washington Post Co. Both the Times' Arthur Sulzberger and the Post's Donald Graham are big believers in a digital future. And both can see firsthand how much traffic Digg contributes to their websites. If I were to place a bet on those two? I'd say the Post, which already owns Slate and has close dealings with Microsoft; Digg's Microsoft ad deal would not discomfit Graham the way it might other businessmen. The Post also has a stronger balance sheet, with a market cap four times the Times'.

That's pure speculation, of course. Acquisition talks fall apart all the time — and for Digg, especially, with its history of almost-but-not-quite deals, I wouldn't be surprised if nothing came of this latest rumor. Still, it's telling that the Valley's talk about Digg has changed from scoffing at its overinflated valuation to talking about who's willing to meet Digg's terms.

Digg CEO Jay Adelson gave me the standard noncomment about "rumors and speculation." But given his transcontinental commute from New York to San Francisco, I wouldn't be surprised if he'd be glad to put his company up for sale. For founder Kevin Rose, a sale would be more emotional. He'd have to be comfortable with whoever buys the company, since he'd likely stay involved. His Diggnation podcast, which draws on headlines from Digg, is one of the centerpieces of his other startup, Revision3. Digg's contentious audience, too, might not take to the site's new owners. That's the biggest obstacle, I suspect, to any deal happening. Those who would profit from the wisdom of crowds must contend with their madness, too.

(Photo by briancaldwell)

Feature

1:43 PM on Wed Nov 7 2007
By Owen Thomas
35,450 views
11 comments

Comments

  • Another $300M deal? My advice for Web 2.0 - start asking for Euros.

  • Image of Furious George Furious George at 02:35 PM on 11/07/07 *

    $300MM has got to be disappointing for these guys. I mean, it's a retardedly large amount of money for what Digg is (which is, at its essence, a whole lot of nothing). But then again, this is the age of the second Internet bubble -- where dying beasts like MySpace are purchased for a half-bil, and even the latest micro-purpose fad sites are snapped up for billions.

  • Image of sample032 sample032 at 02:45 PM on 11/07/07 *

    If it's speculation you want, maybe Facebook (also friendly with Microsoft) is using Microsoft's $240 million and some borrowed money to get Digg.

  • I have my digg account up for sale if anyone wants that too!

  • The key to Digg's popularity is its independence from the media giants

  • Image of sample032 sample032 at 04:32 PM on 11/07/07 *

    @SEARCH ENGINES: I think it has more to do with an opening in the market. The Slashdot crowd is older, they have a little bit larger collective ego, more political, and their interests are generally closer to hardware. The Digg readers are certainly more of a fanboy crowd in their interests, e.g. Apple, Ubuntu, Kevin Rose.

    Look at Reddit. They're part of an established media company, but that didn't hurt them. What attracted readers to Reddit was, like Digg, the news on the front page.

    It has more to do with demographics than media giants.

  • kevinrose says "big changes coming soon", in a comment here:
    [digg.com]

  • From: WWW.TECHCRUNCH.COM: TRACKBACK at 08:02 PM on 11/07/07

    One thing that has become a certainly in our little tech world - a few months can’t go by without rumors surfacing that a sale of Digg is imminent. CEO Jay Adelson and cofounder Kevin Rose seem to be in a perpetual rumor cycle. The problem is, they seem to be the ones at fault for the rumors.

  • From: WWW.JOSSIP.COM: TRACKBACK at 06:46 AM on 11/08/07

    Digg, that site you’re always hearing is important but don’t really understand why, might finally be sold. Word on the street is that a major media player is set to buy the link sharing site for $300 to $400 million.

  • Is Digg worth 100Million? I doubt it. Why you dont you buy a less trafficed aggregator and use existing resources to make it as trafficed as Digg?

    Here's a list:

    Breitbart.com
    buzztracker.com
    Congoo.com
    Daylife.com
    Newser.com

    All of which you could buy between 5-20 million and use the other 80 million for something called cash reserve





  • From: FEEDS.FEEDBURNER.COM: TRACKBACK at 12:08 PM on 12/17/07

    It’s been a little over a month since the last rumors surfaced about social news site Digg trying to sell itself. Then, Digg’s reported asking price was at least $300 million. A reliable source just confirmed that number with us.

Start a discussion:

Reply by Email

Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.