SAN FRANCISCO, 9:47 AM, SUN JUL 6 | 1 POSTS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS | tips@valleywag.com | RSS

Post this number, get banned from Digg.

NICK DOUGLAS — 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0. Apparently that number (represented in hexadecimal here) is a key used to decrypt movies from DVDs. Because it helps bypass technological locks arguably meant to protect copyrighted information, publishing it may violate the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. It could definitely earn a takedown notice from a regulatory group. A user posted this number on Digg. The post rose to the front page on the social news site, whence it disappeared. So someone posted it again. That post earned a record-breaking 15,000+ diggs: that's 15,000 Digg users voting it up, one hundred times the diggs on a typical front-page post. And then it disappeared — utterly deleted. So why is this a big deal? See below.

Digg, the most popular social news site with over a million registered members, has come to represent a shift in how Internet users find their news. One of the draws of Digg is that anyone can post a link, and anyone can vote for a link — if enough users vote for a story, it goes to Digg's front page without any editorial intervention. If a story improperly lands on page 1, users can bury it with negative votes. The trick is that Digg's employees don't have to promote or delete posts. With this comes the expectation that they never will — it would violate the sanctity of community-driven news, or the Matrix would kill Neo, or whatever.

So imagine a horde of teens and college boys who call everything censorship, suddenly seeing a top story disappear without a trace (unlike buried posts, which are still available but vanish from the front page). They're pretty sure they've been censored, and maybe they really have. (Digg founder Kevin Rose didn't respond when I asked if his staff deleted the posts, but a Digg user tells me Rose actually dugg the story.)

They're pissed. They feel their Digg overlords have sold out. They want to see a fight against what they judge as an illegitimate law that violates their free speech — I mean come on, it's illegal to publish a number? — and Digg has apparently denied them that fight. Now they're complaining about it on other social news sites like Reddit. And they're revolting (ha ha, yes, they always have been): here's another popular Digg post, "How I got banned from Digg, which links to a full explanation of the story.

1:57 PM on Tue May 1 2007
By Nick Douglas
2,365 views
6 comments

Comments

  • The hilarious thing about this is that most of digg's users subscribe to two ridiculous things that digg is totally pissing on here 1) That EVERYTHING dissing your point of view is censorship and 2) That "you really can make a difference" on the internets.

    More and more front page stories are essentially "activist" pieces. I saw a story with the approximate headline "Joe Dickhead's sister disappeared in Iran, digg this to help!!" as though the digg community has actually ever helped anyone with their collective voice. Don't say otherwise though, these kids think they're making a difference without even leaving mom's basement.

    With the perception of being censored combined with this digg-activist mindset, I'm actually interested in seeing the outcome.

  • Wait arent these the people we should be hiring for one of six cool, lucrative high paying key jobs for thier insight and internet savvy?

    How do we know who to hire if theyre all getting banned?

  • Digg did "censor" the posts [ http://blog.digg.com/?p=73 ]. And then the news broke that HD-DVD sponsored an episode of Diggnation. It's a conspiracy of course!

    Gotta love the internet street fight.

  • This is a good lesson for Digg's community. Digg isn't the EFF.

  • I think a large part of the uproar is over the fact that the only sites really actively "hushing" the key are Wikipedia and Digg; while Valleywag, Wired and all others are (seemingly) unconcerned about legal action.

    Let's just call it what it is- the "Web 2.0" generation's version of the DeCSS sprawl.

  • This may well turn into a major gun-meets-foot incident for the AACS, who have been serving DMCA takedown notices for some time now. Oddly, the notices have mostly been served to links to the content rather than the content itself, but too many blogs have now published the information to properly stifle it.

    The irony being that a widely-available code could be a huge step towards HD-DVD winning the format wars.

Start a discussion:

Reply by Email

Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.