[Update: Hi, new reader! If you want more current AOL creepy user news, check out AOL creepy user watch: Volume 10, Volume 11, and Volume 12 — each creepier than the volume below. True addicts can subscribe to the Valleywag AOL news feed.]
- Google plans to keep recording search records like the ones AOL leaked last week. CEO Eric Schmidt cites "very sophisticated security plans" — in other words, Google employees are actually taught not to publicly release a massive database of private info. [CIO]
- Our brother blog Consumerist lays out the surgical tools for dissecting AOL's records. [Consumerist]
- Splunkd.com has the sexiest search tool for those records. [Splunkd]
- Best of the worst searches found by Consumerist readers: from morning sickness to abortion, a leather daddy, and a girl worried about getting pregnant and "what does god mean when he says bless those who spitefully use you."
- Reader Kevin points out one user (a psychiatric counselor looking for a job in Colorado) obsessed with quick weight loss. She's turned to the book of Revelation, the zodiac, psychic schools, private investigators, and Victorian poetry. She (or a patient) dreams about being drenched in blood. [AOL search record for User 1912452]












Comments
Dude... who the heck is Eric Schwartz?? the bastard child of Eric Schmidt and Jason Schwartz??
CEO Eric Schwartz?
I am not sure which is creepier - keeping all these records non-encrypted or people's glee at digging in the dirt.
Not to spoil the Schadenfreude of non-AOL users, but large data sets as the one released have been used in the research community for long, long time. True, these are hard to obtain being considered in a way 'know-how'. Unfortunately this is the only reason why they have been handled comparatively sensitively up until now. But rest assured that all your not_necessarily_AOL search queries, SMSs, online activity traces together with respective IPs, phone localities are in the hands of not very trustworthy individuals that may or may not choose to use these to their advantage or sheer malice at some point. Or may or may not leave their intended safe storage with a disgruntled grad student some day. Also quite possible, while idly occupying space on servers at universities favourited by script kiddies and wannabe hackers - be duplicated and consequently released in the wild.
As long as there aren't any enforced regulations as to how information is being exactly "owned" (for instance credit cards records being jointly owned by the cc company and the individual) and thus governed, as long as encryption is being treated as something exotic, there will be gross privacy violations like the one with AOL.
I apologize for the rather long comment.
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?