<![CDATA[Valleywag: Trends]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/valleywag.com.png <![CDATA[Valleywag: Trends]]> http://valleywag.com/tag/trends http://valleywag.com/tag/trends <![CDATA[ Goodbye cruel online world ]]> The Times of London has a hilarious story on the rise of a new phenomenon they dub the "Facebook Suicide," — completely deleting all your information from a social network. If this were an actual, measurable trend, it might cause some consternation in the social networking world, but, after reading the article, Silicon Valley should be relieved. All the people quoted come off like complete technophobic loons. Take 27-year-old Stephanie, who quit Facebook to save her relationship with her insecure, insanely jealous, and manipulative boyfriend, who couldn't stand to see old pictures of her on her exes' profiles. "Facebook was damaging my relationship with my boyfriend to such an extent that if I hadn't done it [deleted her profile] we wouldn't be together now," she states. "As soon as my Facebook profile died, our relationship improved." Right-o there, Steph. It's Facebook's fault that your boyfriend is an abusive control freak. But leave it to the therapists to take the whole thing way too seriously...
Patricia Rogers, a counsellor and fellow of the BACP, even worries that the feelings that lead to Facebook suicide could trigger the loneliness and lack of self-esteem felt by people who really do take their own lives.

"It could be incredibly damaging for the ego to realise that you haven't got as many friends as you thought you had, or that those friends aren't particularly meaningful," she says.

"Comparing yourself with others, a big preoccupation on sites such as Facebook, can be damaging psychologically so, as a precaution, I think that people who leave should be carefully monitored, or at least checked up on, and then referred to counselling resources if necessary."
We look forward to seeing flyers for the Facebook Suicide prevention hotline come up in our newsfeed. ]]>
Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:28:40 PDT Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300153&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Mark Pincus, Tribe cofounder, notes that ... ]]> flip flops." [Mark Pincus Blog] ]]> Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:34:29 PDT Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=283443&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ The number one car in Silicon Valley is ... ]]> The number one car in Silicon Valley is the Toyota Prius hybrid. [San Jose Mercury News] (Photo from Wikipedia) ]]> Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:51:20 PDT Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280880&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ Declaring e-mail bankruptcy ]]> 231055352_67ed53d0ac.jpgNICK DOUGLAS — "If you've sent me an email (and you aren't my wife, partner, or colleague), you might want to send it again." So says Fred Wilson, venture capitalist, declaring e-mail bankruptcy today on his blog. He's not the first high-profile person to take this measure. Here are three other notables who've given up on their e-mail (the most famous of whom reportedly white-lied) and three who found a better way.

  • Lawrence Lessig: The highest-profile email bankruptcy to date. The copyright attorney (who fought a Supreme Court case against a 20-year extension of all U.S. copyrights) sent a mass e-mail in 2004 asking anyone with important unanswered e-mail to reply, which would flag their mail as important. He carried off the task with aplomb, apologizing for failing to maintain "cyber decency." But rumor has it that Lessig still went through much of his "bankrupt" e-mail.
  • Andrew Baron: The producer of the Rocketboom show reportedly declared an e-mail reboot in 2006.
  • Michael Arrington: In October 2006, the publisher of the TechCrunch blog came back from vacation and deleted months of e-mails. He also turned off instant messaging.
  • The better fix: Sean Bonner: Instead of dropping all his current e-mails, Sean Bonner put a throttle on future mail. The founder of the Metroblogging city-blog network started autoresponding to e-mail this month, saying he only checks e-mail once a day.
  • Tim Ferriss: Sean's following what Ferriss recommends in his book The 4-Hour Workweek. Ferriss follows his own plan (and apparently truly works four hours a week).
  • Andy Baio: Upcoming's founder says he built a 10,000-e-mail backlog in 2006. He spent six weeks fixing it.

Before you try this at home, remember that the people above can get hundreds of e-mails a day. Try autoresponders before you try bankruptcy; everyone appreciates some sort of response. Consider hiring an assistant, even part-time, for less than you could make by saving your e-mail time. If these measures seem like too much, you're not that bad off. You just need to get quicker at managing your e-mail.

(Photo: Midnight Beep)

]]>
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:46:36 PDT Nick Douglas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=254608&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why the Valley's not getting laid ]]> As the President of the Colonies said in Battlestar Galactica, if the human race is going to survive after the Googlers Cylons attack, we're gonna have to start making babies. So why does all of Silicon Valley have such a hard time getting it on?

  • Sun CEO Jon Schwartz's ponytail (pictured) has a 40-mile-radius aura of unsexiness.
  • As Tom Foremski found, Cox Interactive keeps blocking Craigslist. Granted, if I wanted to see Cox on Craigslist, I'd just go to m4m. But seriously, the Internet provider is keeping geeks from the only way they know how to hook up. [Silicon Valley Watcher]
  • They write jokes like Wife 1.0 OS. "Wife 1.0 comes with several support programs, such as Clean and Sweep 3.0 , Cook It 1.5 and Do Bills 4.2." Har har. [Craigslist]
  • When they actually do post ads, geeks write shit like: "I'm looking for someone who doesn't want to be a wife right now, but misses some of the aspects of being a wife. That is, taking care of a man. I'm a 35 year old bachelor, a software professional, and I'm in the middle of a project right now." Come on now, Michael Arrington — you're not really a software professional. [Craigslist]

After the jump, the "keep the damn bars open" theory.

  • And who are the suave, snappily-dressed men to offset the nerds? Venture capitalists. Oh, perfect, because as admin assistant Sand Hill Slave can attest, nothing's hotter than a coked-out stripey-wearing VC associate who keeps bragging about his job. [Sand Hill Slave]
  • And the women of the Valley? "Hot for Silicon Valley" isn't a slam on real looks — it's a slam on every woman who insists on wearing a pantsuit from the 90s.
  • Closing time in San Francisco: 2 AM. Closing time in San Jose: 2 AM. Closing time in Cupertino: 2 AM. Come on, California lawmakers — bar-going geeks need at least another hour to loosen up.
  • The bedroom's out of wifi range.

Then again, it could be worse — we could all be in Washington, with all the romance of Silicon Valley and all the intelligence of Miami.

]]>
Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:46:36 PDT Nick Douglas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=179440&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Lazy news: New York Magazine finds the Internet again ]]> Two Internet users - ValleywagReaders of the New York Magazine (ones who don't read Slate, the New York Times Styles, Forbes, the San Francisco Chronicle, or Wired) now know there's a boom on. Writer Kurt Andersen spends three pages (well, the last page is two lines, like the last page of a dictated-length term paper) telling the same story as the other papers, but with the cluelessness with which the New York media glitterati always approach the Internet. It's like seeing USA Today redo a trend piece, but without the humility. So spare yourself the read and use the Valleywag Lazy News Edition.

  • Title: The Way We Boom Now
  • Subtitle: What this age of Internet euphoria looks like to those of us who were in the game last time around. For one, bubbles aren't completely bad.
  • The Internet industry is a bubble again. But it's not a bubble. But it is a bubble...or is it? No. Yes.
  • Poster children: Fred Wilson, the blogging VC who fed the first bubble, now chastising the fools who fed the first bubble; MySpace, YouTube, and DailyCandy (sing with me: one of these things is not like the others...); bloggers and podcasters
  • Illustration: (Pictured) The backs of two chic Net users, one in 1998 and one in 2006. Message unclear.
  • Lead: Kurt Andersen and his friends are prescient but too dumb to notice.
  • Bold names: John Battelle, dot-com journalist survivor of Boom 1 and founder of blog ad network Federated Media Publishing; Walter Isaacson, Internet czar of Time Warner in the 90s; Michael Hirschorn, Andersen's former business partner at Inside; Fred Wilson, "rockstar" VC; Jerry Colonna, Fred's co-founder at VC firm Flatiron; Dany Levy, founder of DailyCandy (more on her later today); Michael Wolff, Burn Rate burnout
  • Lesson 1: A $100-million dollar valuation for a shopping newsletter is "really not crazy" if Kurt Andersen decides it's not. This is the magic logic of trend stories.
  • Lesson 2: If Valleywag dedicates 250 words to a tip, it's worth one sentence to a real paper.
  • Lesson 3: Burn Rate author Michael Wolff sucks at forecasting. Also, he calls the Internet "the business."
  • Best line: "I'm a rock star again." — Fred Wilson
  • Non sequitur: The whole slant is "We've learned our lesson" — but Fred's quoted saying half the boom participants weren't around for the 90s bubble. Where'd they learn this lesson, in grade school?
  • WTF: "To call a Web business a 'dot-com' in 2006 would be the equivalent of calling a black person 'colored.'" I tried to verify this, but there weren't any black people around.

The Way We Boom Now [New York Magazine]
Earlier Lazy News: Web 2.0 has a local address [Valleywag]

]]>
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:44:15 PDT ndouglas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=169178&view=rss&microfeed=true