<![CDATA[Valleywag: great firewall of china]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/valleywag.com.png <![CDATA[Valleywag: great firewall of china]]> http://valleywag.com/tag/great firewall of china http://valleywag.com/tag/great firewall of china <![CDATA[ Reporters find presumed privileges revoked behind China's Great Firewall ]]> The Chinese government may have assured the International Olympic Committee that reporters would enjoy Western freedoms while covering the Olympic games, such as unfettered access to the Internet. Once on the ground, however, journalists have discovered that's not exactly the case. The IOC has been busy backtracking. Olympics reps now have clarified that open Web access is only for sites about "Olympic competitions" — not, say, Amnesty International, one of many sites that has been blocked. The question no one has asked, however, is why China should feel compelled to act in any other way?

No restrictions of press freedoms will ultimately harm the financial interest by companies like NBC, which paid $900 million for the right to broadcast the games. And technology companies here in the Valley, from Cisco to Google, have found catering to the censorship whims of party apparatchiks to be quite profitable. While the IOC hides behind apolitical rhetoric as China's human rights abuses have accelerated in advance of the games in an effort to sweep the streets of any political dissidents reporters might stumble upon.

As for trying to get past the filters, good luck. Some of the best network engineers in the world, in both China and the United States, have been developing technology to make sure it won't happen while keeping an eye out for anyone who attempts it. It is illegal in China to use encryption without providing the government with the keys they would need to crack it, and the country could obviously care less about the public perception of restricting access or information from the press by whatever means necessary.

Beijing's continued problem with visibility thanks to air pollution serves as a handy metaphor. The economic and industrial boom in the country makes it easy for everyone to overlook abuses and accept obfuscation of the truth as the cost of doing business. And business is good. So while journalists wring their hands and cry about press freedom, you won't see their employers divesting from the country in protest any time soon. (Photo by Simon Osborne)

]]>
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:00:00 PDT Jackson West http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031271&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Google keeps Tibet riots on Youtube, off Google News ]]> GoogleHongKong.jpg After China's Internet censors blocked access to YouTube because of clips depicting riots in Tibet, Google immediately began work to restore access to the online-video site in the country. But news stories regarding the Tibet protest remain censored from Google News China, Blogoscoped's Phillip Lenssen reports. Below, screenshots from Google News Hong Kong, which features the Tibet protests, and Google News China, which does not.

http://valleywag.com/assets/resources/2008/03/GoogleNewsChina-thumb.jpg
http://valleywag.com/assets/resources/2008/03/GoogleNewsHongKong-thumb.jpg

]]>
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:40:26 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370306&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Evading the Great Firewall of China ]]> James Fallows's epic 4,221-word article on the Great Firewall of China in The Atlantic breaks with geek convention. When writing about China's technological efforts to block undesirable Web content, we're supposed to conclude that censorship is damage, and the Internet will route around it. (Wired did so last October.) Fallows instead concludes that all the Chinese authorities have to do is make finding unlawful content on the Internet slightly annoying. The masses of people with more interesting things to do than configure proxy servers will comply. But what we really like is how The Atlantic pitched this story to us: Fallows's work isn't a provocative thinkpiece on the nature of censorship in the age of the Internet, it's service journalism! Who cares about the Chinese people — you just want to know if the Internet will work when you travel to Beijing for the Olympics. Forthwith, the PR person's suggested questions, and answers extracted from Fallows piece:

  • Will foreigners traveling to China for the Olympics experience Internet difficulties when corresponding with family and friends back home?
    The government bodies in charge of censoring the Internet have told [engineers] to get ready to unblock access from a list of specific Internet Protocol (IP) addresses — certain Internet cafés, access jacks in hotel rooms and conference centers where foreigners are expected to work or stay during the Olympic Games.
    (Translation: No.)
  • How do foreign businesses in China operate with the Great Firewall in place?
    A VPN, or virtual private network ... creates your own private, encrypted channel that runs alongside the normal Internet. From within China, a VPN connects you with an Internet server somewhere else. Every foreign business operating in China uses such a network.
  • What are the methods commonly used to bypass the firewall?
    "Anyone in China who wants to get around the firewall can choose between two well-known and dependable alternatives: the proxy server and the VPN.
  • Why doesn't the Chinese government do more to enforce the surveillance systems it worked so hard to create?
    What the government cares about is making the quest for information just enough of a nuisance that people generally won't bother. Most Chinese people, like most Americans, are interested mainly in their own country. All around them is more information about China and things Chinese than they could possibly take in. By making the search for external information a nuisance, they drive Chinese people back to an environment in which familiar tools of social control come into play.
]]>
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:00:43 PST Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358895&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ China bans all RSS feeds ]]> Great Wall The Middle Kingdom's net censors have finally patched up a great gaping hole in the Great Firewall of China, its not-so-effective Internet defense against the rest of the world's free press. It's now blocking all RSS feed traffic in an effort to stop the flow of information critical of the Chinese government. The Public Security Bureau has attempted to quash blogs and other forms of forbidden information ever since the great Chinese Internet surge in 2006. Of course, this ban will probably get swiftly dropped once China's intelligentsia discovers that RSS, besides being used for blog-headlines distribution, is also a vital tool for data transfer from Web-based applications. Photo by David Baron)

]]>
Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:46:34 PDT Mary Jane Irwin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307712&view=rss&microfeed=true