<![CDATA[Valleywag: federated media]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/valleywag.com.png <![CDATA[Valleywag: federated media]]> http://valleywag.com/tag/federated media http://valleywag.com/tag/federated media <![CDATA[ The death of conversational marketing ]]> An unproar in the world of tech blogs is uncovering a broader fault line between writers and advertisers. Om Malik's GigaOm and his other blogs have dropped their outside ad-sales firm, Federated Media, a startup run by John Battelle. Federated isn't just another ad network, nor is Battelle just another entrepreneur; he helped start Wired and The Industry Standard and an author of a book about Google, thinks that the future of marketing is conversations. And he launched Federated around that notion. Rather than shouting at readers with ads, marketers will use blogs to engage with their readers — and pay handsomely for the privilege. That's his theory, at any rate, which he is expounding in a forthcoming book.

The reality: Battelle's dream of conversational marketing has turned into something more like the schlocky endorsements radio hosts get paid to do. By falling so short of his rhetoric, Federated's experiments have mostly ended in embarrassment, both for him and the bloggers he represents. Last year, he roped Malik and other writers into a scheme to have them recite a Microsoft slogan. And though Battelle apologized for that advertising campaign, he's conducting a similar campaign for Intel — though he has wisely picked so-called "social media marketers" with less journalistic credibility to lose; most already willingly shill for products on Twitter, Digg, and the like.

That's the insult. But Battelle's company has also delivered an injury, in the form of an abrupt slashing of advertising rates. GigaOm, TechCrunch, Silicon Alley Insider, and a host of other tech blogs represented by Federated have had their official rates cut 35 percent; deals negotiated with large advertisers are presumably being struck at even steeper discounts.

So Malik has taken his business elsewhere, to IDG, the publisher of PC World and several other large technology trades. As with Federated, IDG will sell ads, keep a large portion, and share the rest with Malik's company; 30 to 40 percent is a typical commission in the business. IDG has a vast army of salespeople to serve its print publications; as the print business vanishes, it makes sense to busy them with selling online advertising. Federated, meanwhile, has had to assemble its sales team from scratch.

Federated's slogan is that it is "author-driven." What does it say that an author has been driven from its ranks? Malik and Battelle are both savvy businessmen who know each other well. (I have known both for a long time, too, and edited their columns at the late Business 2.0 magazine.) IDG simply cut Malik a better deal, I believe — and no amount of rhetoric about "serving authors" from Federated could make up for the financial shortfall. In every negotiation, the time arrives to wrap up the conversation and strike a deal.

(Photo by Scott Beale/Laughing Squid)

]]>
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:00:00 PST Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5096382&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Federated Media slashes rates to $5 CPM ]]> John Battelle has his own plan for riding out the holiday ad-buying slump. The founder of online-advertising network Federated Media, which brokers ads for sites like Boing Boing, GigaOm, and Dooce, can't fire writers, but he can cut the price of their ads. John, be careful. Your inbred network is made up of bloggers who are also endorsers, who also shill their own products. Your list of clients is months out of date — it includes Digg and Fark, who long ago dropped Federated. Cut ad rates too carelessly and your Rube Goldberg business model may backfire. I mean this as the highest compliment: If anyone can lay himself off by accident, that someone is John Battelle. Here's the spam that Federated sent to bloggers this morning:

—-—-—-- Forwarded message —-—-—--
From: Federated Media
Date: Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:05 AM
Subject: A Holiday Gift from FM, $5 CPM's
To: melissa@melissagira.com

Believe it or not the holidays are already fast approaching! To make planning your holiday advertising campaign quicker and easier, we've created a Holiday Shopping Federation that includes the best gift and shopping related content in the Federated Media family of sites. Sites in this category include Uncrate, Mighty Goods, The Bargainist, and many more.

The Holiday Shopping Federation reaches the savviest of shoppers. They are avid readers of product reviews, and hunt down everything from the best in fashion to the coolest new tech gadgets. This is where engaged shoppers peruse gift guides, and look for suggestions for everyone on their list.

Here's the best part, for a limited time only, we're offering access to these high-quality sites at a low $5 CPM.

Reserve your campaign now through November 28th to lock in this low rate, and get access to readers on some of the best content on the web.

Start Planning and take advantage of these low CPM's before holiday inventory gets booked up!

Cheers and Happy Holidays,
Federated Media

FM Self-Serve Homepage
Online Marketing Idea Exchange

]]>
Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:20:00 PST Paul Boutin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5085936&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Valley homophobes still drafting Yes on Prop 8 response ad ]]> BoomTown reporter Kara Swisher rappelled from a skylight at Jerry Yang's secret hideout to score this draft copy of an ad, in which a bunch of tech bigwigs come out in favor of gay marriage — or at least in opposition to Proposition 8, a California state ballot initiative which would ban it. No Valley company in its right mind would be seen opposing gay marriage, so why bother?

Right: Because it's an awesome branding opportunity. The draft is a self-parody of corner office drama, full of Honorary Co-Chairs, Leaders, and Former CEOs. But the real story is: Who's missing? Sergey Brin and Eric Schmidt are here, but not Larry Page. Twitter's Ev Williams is here, but not Digg's Kevin Rose. Federated Media: Present. TechCrunch: Absent. Mark Zuckerberg is not here, but Sheryl Sandberg pulled a John Hancock: She's right up top, where Owen can't miss her. Oh, look, she's trying to make nice! She's going to be sorry.

]]>
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:40:00 PDT Paul Boutin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5071165&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Boing Boing founder's directory of wonderful ads ]]> Mark Frauenfelder launched bOING bOING, an ink-on-paper zine, in 1988. He did the artwork for Billy Idol's 1993 Cyberpunk album, using a Mac instead of a photo studio. Frauenfelder joined Wired when that was considered a foolish move by media professionals. Later he resurrected Boing Boing as a website, then again as a blog in 2000. He's now editor-in-chief of Make magazine. Does this guy have an unlimited supply of cool? Not unless he learns to say no to advertisers who co-opt him.

When Frauenfelder appeared in an Apple TV spot a few years ago, his fans loved seeing their fringe-culture hero take over the boob tube. But today ads are jammed full of Internet hipsters. Boing Boing's "band manager," John Battelle, has turned old-fashioned host endorsements into an online art form at Federated Media, his advertising agency. He's holding a conference right now in San Francisco's Presidio, telling eager brand managers that endorsers like Mark Frauenfelder make them part of a conversation with Internet consumers.

Battelle builds sites whose ads feature authors on whose blogs he also sells ads. It's a reputational Ponzi scheme far more complex than a George Foreman grill. Maybe that's why I flinch when Frauenfelder's face pops up on my screen with an Adobe logo and a button that says Grab Widget. Mark, if I want a widget, I'll open your magazine and make one myself.

]]>
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:00:00 PDT Paul Boutin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5064155&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New York Times reporter says he's an unwitting Dell shill ]]> Marc Santora, the New York Times reporter who appears in ads for Dell's DigitalNomads site, says he received no compensation for the ad, which came from an interview Santora did for Big Think, a website backed by Facebook investor Peter Thiel. What appears to have happened: Dell or its ad agency, Federated Media, created the ad for Dell's DigitalNomads, using a clip from Santora's Big Think video. In a comment, Big Think cofounder Peter Hopkins says that Dell is a sponsor of his site, but the ad does not mention Big Think. (The Big Think interview was also published to YouTube, and DigitalNomads' producers embedded the clip in a blog post.) From what Santora's saying, no one asked him or the Times for permission to run the endorsement. If so, Dell could be in rather big trouble — and not just with the Times.

FTC rules forbid deceptive advertising — such as an ad from Dell which suggests a New York Times reporter has endorsed its vision of mobile technology, when he hasn't. The agency also has strict rules governing endorsements, not all of which seem to have been followed here. Bottom line: Santora seems to be the victim of a sleazy new Internet-enabled advertising tactic. He does offer this amusing side note: The one time he wrote about Dell was when the computer maker's "Dude, You're Getting a Dell" spokesman was arrested on pot charges. Here's his note to us:

I am not really sure what to say about the item posted on your website about my being a "shill" for Dell. I was asked to do an interview fror a starter web site called "Big Think." I checked them out and they have interviewed a good number of respectable people and I had heard of no problems. They wanted to discuss the role changing technology has had in covering things like the war in Iraq. Seemed harmless. I received absolutely NO compensation. And I have no idea how they do their advertising.

I am on vacation and on my way to India so will not be checking in much, but thought it might be worth clearing up any improper suggestions linger.

BTW, if it matters — and I can't believe it does because this all seems a bit silly — the only piece I ever wrote about Dell was when "the Dell Dude" was busted for using pot. I think I wrote a couple of pieces on that actually. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE7DA1F3BF931A25751C0A9659C8B63&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/S/Santora,%20Marc

Anyway, going back to my vacation. Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Marc Santora

]]>
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:00:00 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5063543&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New York Times reporter shills for Dell site ]]> Why is Marc Santora, a respected war correspondent for the New York Times, appearing in ads chattering about mobile technology? Click on the ad, running on sites like VentureBeat, and you're taken to a site, DigitalNomads, which appears to be a collection of blog-filler pablum about the wonders of the wireless Internet. Buried at the bottom is a tiny disclaimer: "Powered by Dell." Dig under the ad-placement code, and you'll see that the ad is sold by Federated Media, John Battelle's online-ad network. Battelle's outfit grew infamous last summer for getting some of the bloggers for whom he sells ads to recite a sponsor's slogan. That last time, it was Microsoft.

At no point does Santora mention Dell's name. But his underlying message, that new technological gear helps us all do our jobs better, certainly serves Dell's purposes. I would have thought that the strict Times ethics code would forbid such an endorsement, paid or otherwise. Why bloody the reputation of someone who's taking a bullet to get stories for the newspaper? I've asked the Times what's going on, but haven't heard back yet. Update: Marc Santora has written in to let us know he had no involvement, financial or otherwise, with the ad — which just adds to the headscratching.

]]>
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:40:00 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5063375&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ GOP VP's sister works for Federated Media? Nope ]]> (Update: Earlier today, 10 Zen Monkeys reported that Sarah Palin's sister, the one involved in a baroque family scandal, was now working in Sausalito for John Battelle's online ad agency. We've confirmed that this rumor is false. The original post at 10 Zen Monkeys has been unpublished. In the interest of transparency to the 115 of you who read it on RSS, the original text is below.)

I can't get anyone at Federated Media to confirm or deny the claim by 10 Zen Monkeys that Federated Media accountant Molly Johnson is formerly Molly McCann, and sister to Alaska governor Sarah Palin, now the Republican vice presidential candidate. Sausalito-based Federated is the agency that sells ads for Boing Boing, TechCrunch, and many more sites. It matters because Palin — and hence McCann, who may now be Johnson — will be heavily scrutinized over Palin's alleged ... oh, just read the whole thing on Wikipedia. Honestly, 10 Zen Monkey's report drips with a bit too much eagerness to take down Palin, so I don't trust their judgement yet. I'll believe it — or not — when permatanned Federated founder John Battelle gets back to us.

]]>
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:30:00 PDT Paul Boutin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5043691&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ John Battelle takes $22 million in fuck-you money ]]> John BattelleAnyone telling you that Federated Media, the online ad network which reps Boing Boing, GigaOm, TechCrunch and other blogs, has raised $50 million from investors is dead wrong. It's true, Oak Investment Partners and others paid $50 million for shares of Federated. But only half of that went to the company, we're told; the rest went to founder John Battelle and other employees. According to our source, Battelle's take was roughly 90 percent of the insider shares sold, or about $22 million.

I'd long thought that Battelle's flip-the-bird photo, used here, was a reflection of his charmingly combative personality. As a founding editor of Wired, which set the tech world on fire in the '90s and helped inflate the bubble, Battelle failed to stack up the tall dollars. He founded The Industry Standard, which sold more pages of advertising than any other magazine in American in 2000 and then went bankrupt in 2001. Battelle, in short, has been adept at chronicling booms, but not profiting from them. Until now.

Battelle is just the latest entrepreneur to cash out before his company goes public, a practice once frowned upon in Silicon Valley. But Federated Media turned profitable last fall, we're told. Being cash-flow positive means never having to say you're sorry. And it also gives entrepreneurs leverage with investors that they never had in the '90s, when building Web companies was much more expensive.

So at last he's earned what they call in the Valley "fuck-you money" — enough money to simply walk away, should a job turn unpleasant. In fact, we hear that's what Battelle is planning to do, albeit temporarily. He's told investors in Federated that he plans to take a leave from the business to work on his next book, The Conversation.

Where Battelle's profane wealth may get him in trouble is with the bloggers he represents. Unlike him, most of them have yet to cash out, or even turn a profit. Federated Media's take of their advertising — typically 40 percent — strikes many as too high, though most have yet to try their hands at hiring and managing their own salespeople.

But they shouldn't worry. Having enriched himself, Battelle is now thinking of them. After hearing rumors that one of Federated's blogs was in merger talks, he approached the blogger and encouraged him to come talk to Federated first before taking an offer.

In other words, Battelle is now contemplating a blog rollup. Rather than see his customers picked off one by one, with their ad inventory walking out the door, Battelle may use some of the money he's raised to buy blogs himself. It only makes sense. He knows his customers' businesses well, since he organizes conferences, orchestrates redesigns, and performs other services besides for them, in addition to the mundanities of selling advertising.

Battelle likes to think of himself as more than just a business partner to his bloggers. He's their buddy. He's their pal! This bubble has everyone frothy, and the valuations may be making some of the bloggers under his care unduly giddy. While Battelle may enjoy a tipple now and then, friends don't let friends sell drunk.

]]>
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:00:00 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385829&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Federated Media loses another client to an acquisition ]]> original.jpegHigh-Def Digest, a video enthusiast site with more traffic than Boing Boing, has been sold to Internet Brands, a domain-name speculator turned online-advertising network. That's bad news for John Battelle's Federated Media network, which up until now has repped the site; with Sphere's sale to AOL, it's the second acquisition this month to thin Federated's client list.

]]>
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:20:00 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380196&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ John Battelle raises $50 million as AOL snatches away his prize ]]> John BattelleFor once, tech publisher John Battelle has timed a bubble just right. With Wired, where he was a founding editor, he was too early; with The Industry Standard, the tech weekly which crashed and burned early in this decade, a bit too late. But with Federated Media, he's proved his dealmaking prowess. He's all but nailed what we hear is $40 million to $50 million in venture capital for the online-ad network , on a $200 million valuation. And this right before AOL bought Sphere, a blog search engine which, by a rough count, serves more than half of the pageviews Battelle sells to advertisers.

The problem with running a network is that you don't own the pageviews, and websites can always bolt, or be sold. It's hard to imagine AOL won't switch that inventory over to its Platform-A ad network as soon as it can. Not all pageviews are created equal. Sphere's blog-search inventory likely garnered less revenue than some of the high-prestige tech blogs Battelle represents. Still, this is the kind of thing one is happier to have investors learn about after they've committed their money, not before.

]]>
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:20:00 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380163&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Federated Media to raise as much as $50 million in VC round ]]> Federated Media is close to announcing it has won between $40 and $50 million in funding from Oak Investment Partners and others, including Omidyar Network, the investment vehicle of eBay founder Pierre Omidyar. The Series C round sets the value of the blog-friendly online-ad network at $200 million. Insiders have said past reports of Federated's fundraising were premature, but we hear the news is for real this time. At this point, we'll believe it when we see the term sheet. Do send us a copy? [PeHUB]

]]>
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:16:14 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379661&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Federated Media snags $50 million investment? ]]> John BattelleA tipster reports that John Battelle's Federated Media ad network just scored a $50 million investment. We've emailed FM but haven't heard back yet.

]]>
Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:04:00 PDT Jordan Golson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375958&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Federated Media's rumored $200 million valuation annoys its customers ]]> battellemarshall.jpgMatt Marshall's VentureBeat airs a rumor that John Battelle's online blog-ad network, Federated Media, has sold a large stake to Oak Hill Capital. There's logic to it: Oak Hill is a private-equity firm with which his bankers, GCA Savvian, has previously done business. Battelle, left, was on a conference call when I tried to reach him, but in the past he's offered no comment on investment rumors. Another source dashes cold water on the notion that a deal's been done. I'd be the first to tell you not all rumors pan out. What I find more interesting about the report is this line:

Some question whether or not FM is actually worth this much money, as there are many advertising options available to its publishers.
One of the blogs for which Federated sells ads, as one of Marshall's bloggers goes on to note in the post, is VentureBeat. Is Marshall, right, using his writer as a proxy to express his discontent with his ad salesman? ]]>
Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:20:00 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375916&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is John Battelle selling a piece of Federated Media? ]]> John BattelleVentureBeat reports that online ad network Federated Media is close to raising a $30 million round of financing, at a valuation of $200 million. The deal is not as advanced as VentureBeat suggests, we hear. But let's assume a large investor is seriously weighing a term sheet. Awesomely tan tech-reporter-turned-salesman John Battelle must be torn.

He saw Wired, where he was a founding editor, sold to Conde Nast for a pittance. The Industry Standard, which he launched and ran, crashed and burned. Federated Media, which caters to independent bloggers like Boing Boing and Dooce, could well be more successful than either, redeeming his reputation as a businessman. And with the economy teetering, now's a good time to take the money and run, before people deepen their questioning of the blog business model. Still, taking that much money from investors now — if Battelle can even get it — only increases the odds of a sale down the road.

]]>
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:40:03 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369991&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ John Battelle turns down $100 million offer for Federated Media ]]> battelle%20bird%20story.jpgWhen word leaked that John Battelle had hired San Francisco investment bank Savvian to "manage investor interest" in Federated Media, his online-ad network, the move raised a question: How interested were investors? $100 million interested, reports Erick Schonfeld at TechCrunch. That's the offer Battelle got, and turned down, from one unnamed investor. Schonfeld also points out this curiosity: At Battelle's last venture, the Industry Standard, the entrepreneur was the one pushing to sell out, not wait for a better offer.

]]>
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:49:33 PST Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348751&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Federated Media hires a banker -- is John Battelle's company up for sale? ]]> battelle%20bird%20story.jpgJohn Battelle's online-ad rep firm, Federated Media, has hired a small investment bank, Savvian LLC, to "manage investor interest," according to a source close to the company. What does that mean? Hopefully Battelle wasn't giving interested investors his customary greeting, shown here. FM sells advertising and performs other services for blogs in specific subject areas. It's especially strong in tech, representing TechCrunch, GigaOm, and VentureBeat, among others. Online ad networks are fashionable among investors right now, so it's possible Federated could be entertaining buyout offers. But Battelle's choice of a banker is curious: Savvian is known for helping companies in dire straits. It's also known for getting smaller media companies sold to larger ones — such as BeliefNet, recently purchased by News Corp. with Savvian's help.

]]>
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:13:27 PST Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348178&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ John Battelle's secret to making year-end predictions ]]> Battelle predicts with remarkable accuracyAlong with gifts, wassailing, and bah humbugs, the holidays bring an onslaught of predictions for the new year that mostly aren't worth reading. But if you are interested, egoblogger Robert Scoble sits down with the Supremely Tanned One, Federated Media chairman John Battelle, to ask how he manages to make predictions that are remarkably accurate. The secret, replies Battelle to the fawning Scoble, after first congratulating himself for his success rate, is: "A lot of these are not that difficult to predict." It doesn't take the ambiguities of a Nostradamus quatrain to predict that Microsoft would buy its way into advertising, Yahoo would struggle, blogs would get better, and people would call Web 2.0 a bubble. So if you are preparing your own predictions for 2008 and want to achieve a high success rate, don't predict — just state the obvious.

]]>
Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:00:17 PST Tim Faulkner http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336963&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A gift for our dear readers: 10,000 Hulu Invites ]]> HuluI saw a theme this morning as I perused the various other tech sites: Hulu invites! Hulu, the video-streaming partnership between News Corp. and NBC, is throwing open its doors to many early adopters by offering up thousands of invites on several tech sites. If you haven't gotten a chance to play around with Hulu and want to see just what the hell Paul Boutin is complaining about, here's your chance. GigaOm, Read/WriteWeb, TechCrunch, and Mashable are giving away 2,500 invites each. All, we note, are clients of Federated Media, John Battelle's online-ad network. Coincidence, conspiracy, or just part of a future Hulu advertising campaign?

]]>
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:20:09 PST Jordan Golson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336190&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Relive the disgusted voyeurism of Jakob and Julia with the new John and Jen ]]> Another startup boy and his girlfriend have started a Tumblr blog to overchronicle their relationship. Shortly after Vimeo founder Jakob Lodwick and TV personality Julia Allison broke up and ended their blog Jakob and Julia, John Shankman (an employee of the Federated Media online ad agency) started the semi-anonymous JohnandJen.net.

The overwrought emotional style parodies Jakob and Julia's. Early on, Jen wrote:

John apparently doesn't always understand that his "internet experiments" aren't priority number one for the rest of the universe. John doesn't always understand that someone else has finals for the next two weeks, and might have some important life responsibilities aside from responding to nonsensical emails and participating in the public airing of our personal "dirty laundry", if you will.

John replied:

Well, I have to admit, that is not what I was expecting for a first post from Jen. It was very angry and, also, alluded to some things that were very unnecessary. Why do you have to bring things like that up in your first post?

John and Jen make constant references to Jakob and Julia (such as the above comparison of Jen's stubbly "pit" to Julia's lasered "underarm"), which are hilarious to the dozen of us who actually followed that relationship.

]]>
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:37:47 PST Nick Douglas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=333842&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ John Battelle's million-dollar ad deal ]]> John Battelle at Web 2.0WEB 2.0 SUMMIT — At a panel discussion about making money in online video, Federated Media VP of sales Chas Edwards said he'd pulled checks "from a million dollars down to $10,000" for video ads on Federated's network, which includes the popular shows Diggnation and Ask a Ninja. The burning question: Who paid a million bucks to Federated, run by Web 2.0 conference co-chief John Battelle, and for what? We were unable to tackle any of Federated's execs at the jam-packed conference Wednesday. Somebody get Edwards or jbat to spill the details, and send it to us. Otherwise we'll wonder if Edwards wasn't actually referring to Microsoft's non-video advertorial deal for which Federated bloggers wrote ad copy. Why? Because Edwards also said the biggest dollars come from selling "host endorsements" rather than separate advertiser-produced spots.

]]>
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:03:57 PDT Paul Boutin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312714&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ John Battelle wants to hike his rates ]]> John Battelle at Web 2.0WEB 2.0 SUMMIT — Is preternaturally tan conference organizer John Battelle, who runs online-ad network Federated Media, here to interview top industry executives — or cut some deals of his own? "There's this idea that you can sprinkle some pixie dust on all this inventory and make more money," he observes, speaking of the mass of Web ads sold at bargain-basement rates. AOL's Curt Viebranz says that ads sold on Tacoda — the startup he just sold to AOL for a reported $275 million — sell at a $4 cost per thousand viewers. When he hears that figure, Battelle raises his eyebrows and asked Viebranz to talk to him after the panel.

]]>
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:32:02 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312654&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "If I wanted a $14 billion advertising business, ... ]]> Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:30:48 PDT Jordan Golson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312442&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ The great blog rollup ]]> 144241414_c8f8a2945a_m.jpgAt times, there's nothing more amusing than watching a blogger in the middle of a meltdown. Barry Ritholz, the CEO of stock-research firm Fusion IQ, has apparently been seized by panic over an interesting, but unthreatening, development: Big media companies getting into the business of selling ads for blogs. They've already built up an expensive ad sales force, and often find it difficult to grow traffic on their websites faster than their salespeople can sell it. A natural solution: Approach blogs covering similar topics and offer to sell ads on their sites, sharing the revenue. The Washington Post was one of the first to do so, and now, apparently, Reuters is getting into the game. The part that has Ritholz alarmed, though, is a requirement that the blogs "assign" their traffic to the larger company for purposes of getting counted by Nielsen/NetRatings and ComScore Media Metrix, the two largest Web-traffic research firms. Why does Ritholz find this so alarming — and why is he utterly wrong?

To Ritholz, this spells some kind of Internet apocalypse, bringing an end to reliable measures of traffic. The big media companies, in their efforts to become ad reps for smaller blogs, are insidiously "buying" traffic. "Reuters is creating a new financial 'blog ghetto,'" Ritholz fumes. And advertisers, he claims, should be wary.

Nonsense. For one thing, blogs are already in a ghetto, too small, one by one, to even show up in Nielsen's and ComScore's measurements. These agreements are routine, and, in fact, required by Nielsen and ComScore, rather than pushed by the media companies — that explains why the contracts Ritholz has seen are all so similar. And why are they required?

For advertisers, of course. Media buyers understand that they're buying ads that run across a network of websites, and of course want to know the traffic for the entire network, not just the flagship property. So if, say, Reuters salespeople are now selling ads on a bunch of financial blogs, they'll naturally want to report that traffic as part of the advertising buy.

In his effort to spin this as some kind of industry-destroying conspiracy, Ritholz misses out on the natural trend. Naive bloggers like to think that their websites are unique, and that advertisers will want to seek out their audiences, however microscopic, for their special charms.

Charming, but false, of course. Advertising remains a numbers game, a scale business. And Ritholz's hand-waving conspiracy theories just serve to obfuscate the main issue here.

Small blogs have a number of hard choices. First, there's signing up with the likes of Google AdSense, the online-ad networks which pay ludicrously low amounts — low, of course, being better than nothing. Then there's striking an alliance with an online ad-rep firm like Federated Media, or a large media company which chooses to have its salesforce act as third-party ad reps. Lastly, there's the hardest choice of all: Actually spending money to hire your own salespeople. Which, of course, will be tough going if your blog traffic isn't high enough to register on Nielsen or ComScore's listings. (Photo by ">king-edward)

]]>
Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:49:53 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=308272&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Conversational Marketing Summit unofficial afterparty ]]> I stopped by the House of Shields for the "unofficial afterparty" of this week's Federated Media Conversational Marketing Summit and was greeted by a crowd of FM employees and Web 2.0 regulars. You could tell the crowd apart pretty easily — the FM employees wore suitjackets and had the ad-salesman glow to them, the regulars all answered "no" when asked if they attended the conference. A few FM employees indulged my request to pose for a picture doing the John Battelle salute, including Director of Author Services Bill Brazell, pictured above. (Fun fact: he and I graduated from the same high school!) So what is "Conversational Marketing" anyway? New advertising paradigm? Or just a way to keep FM boss Batelle in Mystic Tan? At one point, social media gadfly Chris Heuer and I talked about whether the term itself has a definition beyond "bullshit." He seems to think it does, I'm still undecided. The whole idea has the taint of undisclosed advertorial to me, especially after last June's "people-ready" mini-scandal and its aftermath. After the jump, check out the gallery for more tech marketing people than you can handle. ]]> Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:26:53 PDT Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299312&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ Coming up on the Valleywag calendar ]]>
  • Friday: Anyone heading to Facebook board member Peter Thiel's posh VIP gathering Friday night? Let us know how it goes.
  • Saturday: The Singularity Summit takes place at the Palace of Fine Arts' theater. Be there to hear about the wonderful world of machine learning and how to shape artificial intelligence to avoid a future full of robot attacks. [Singularity Institute]
  • Tuesday: Federated Media's Conversational Marketing Summit is Tuesday and Wednesday at the Presidio. [Federated Media]
    • Wednesday: Stirr is back with another "Founders' Hacks" event, this time up in the city. Schlep your way to Mighty in Potrero Hill to hear founders from Lookery, Vadver, and OoogaLabs try and say their companies names without looking foolish. [Eventbrite]
    • Don Clark of the Wall Street Journal heads up an evening of rock music at the Rockit Room, as a fundraiser for the Girls for a Change charity. [Upcoming]
    Got an event? Send it in to the Valleywag Calendar. ]]>
    Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:53:28 PDT Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297751&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ The return of The Industry Standard ]]> Coming back?Could it be true? Eric Savitz of Barron's blogs about the apparent comeback of his former employer, The Industry Standard. The weekly tech trade magazine inflated, and imploded, more or less in sync with the dotcom bubble; shuttered by owner IDG, it's seen a series of mostly pathetic attempts to resuscitate its website, all of which floundered. But the website now promises that the Standard is "coming back." Odd timing, given Time Inc.'s shuttering of Business 2.0, and the discontinuation of the Red Herring's print edition. Founder John Battelle tersely wishes the new Standard luck. I'm betting that the publication bypasses print and goes straight to the Web — just like Battelle's current venture.

    ]]>
    Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:22:45 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297671&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Federated Media's teeny-weeny remnant problem ]]> Okay, this is ridiculous. On what planet is the bikini-wearing readership of TechCrunch sufficient enough to warrant Federated Media serving up the above ad on its site? None, of course. Federated Media founder John Battelle emails us to point out that the bikini ad from DivaVillage.com and other gender benders displayed to the site's mostly male readers aren't a result of targeting gone awry, but simply the result of Federated Media serving up low-paying, untargeted "remnant" ads when it's not able to sell ads at full price. Battelle also notes that it's TechCrunch's decision, not Federated's, to accept those ads. So there you have it, TechCrunch readers: Michael Arrington, according to John Battelle, thinks you want to buy bikinis.

    ]]>
    Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:55:03 PDT Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=294293&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Digg's targeted ad system is amazing! ]]> No wonder Digg, the nerdly news-discussion site, is dumping Federated Media, John Battelle's online-ad network, as the source of its ads. Lately, FM has outdone itself in precisely targeting its clients' demographics. First, it delivered a $15 off coupon for midpriced casual clothing chain Fashion Bug for Michael Arrington's tech news site TechCrunch, perfect for that blog's target audience of middle-aged Midwestern moms. Now FM is displaying banner ads promoting the American Girl line of books and dolls whenever I visit Digg, as pictured in the screenshot above. John Battelle, how did you know I was completely obsessed with those books ... in fifth grade?

    Like, seriously obsessed. The way that Apple geeks are obsessed with Steve Jobs dolls, except with more hair-braiding.

    American Girl follows a specific formula — create a plucky pre-teen character and set her in a romanticized historical setting. Model a matching doll with pretty hair, clothes, and accessories, sit back and profit. If you're unfamiliar with the brand, then you've never known, or been, a 9-year-old girl. Federated Media, brilliant job on serving up these ads to someone who might appreciate them. Too bad you delivered them about 20 years too late.

    ]]>
    Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:46:25 PDT Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=294041&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ John Battelle feels like he needs more money ]]> Battelle-FingerPrivate Equity Hub reports that Federated Media, the online ad network, has raised $4.5 million in a second round of funding, not long after raising $2 million in venture capital, on top of some seed funding. This, of course, after rumors that FM was "overdue" in raising more funds. We're not sure what founder John Battelle plans to do with all that cash, but perhaps, just perhaps, he might want to bankroll some hair-replacement therapy for FM videoblogger Morgan Webb.

    ]]>
    Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:31:35 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293379&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Videoblogger Morgan Webb shows some skin ]]> TechThatOut believes it's caught Morgan Webb, host of derivative, me-too, copycat tech videoblog WebbAlert, exposing her ... scalp? The screenshot is a bit blurry, raising questions about whether Webb is actually missing some follicles or just had her hair pulled back too tightly. But it does make one wonder why TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington went gaga and declared her "fairly hot." A quick survey of Valleywag's temporary officemates got a different ruling: "fairly scary." But there's something equally scary, and even balder, about WebbAlert.

    WebbAlert discloses on its website that it has "barter arrangements" with other FM-represented sites. But that's not the sales pitch that Webb's husband, Listen.com founder Rob Reid, gave some FM bloggers. Contrary to what the WebbAlert site claims, Reid made suggestions of link-swapping that went beyond mere ad barters. And from the appearance of things, Arrington, among others, took the bait, linking generously to WebbAlert after its launch. Federated Media executives, of course, insisted it was all just a coincidence. Of course. We'll just try not to notice the ethical bald spot here.

    ]]>
    Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:46:05 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293367&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ MerchantCircle provides a circle jerk for local businesses ]]> Need a hand with that?The first rule of Valleywag: Never pitch Valleywag. But sometimes the temptation just proves too great. In response to a post about Google and Yelp's rivalry in local search, a MerchantCircle employee contacted us to tout the company's supposed leadership in the market, pitching the site for some Valleywag love. Well, here's some tough love. We've looked into MerchantCircle's business model .. and found nothing but self-love.

    Here's the pitch:

    Recently, you guys ran a piece comparing Google versus Yelp, and while Yelp gets a lot of 'cool' buzz, they only reach a few big cities and have not captured the practical, business side of the puzzle. MerchantCircle (one word) is about to announce tomorrow that we've passed 200,000 local small business owners signed-up. That number makes us the leader in a space that everyone is trying to get a piece of right now.

    We have more merchants than Google, Yahoo Local, CitySearch, Insider Pages and any other local directory site you can think of.

    Well, that's nice. Suspect, but nice. But then we started digging.

    • MerchantCircle might have businesses listed, but it has practically no users. Site traffic, according to Compete.com, is a fraction of the nearest competitor's.
    • No wonder: It's theoretically possible to browse the directory of listings, but the MerchantCircle site itself is designed as a roach motel for merchants.
    • The boasted merchant listings are questionable. Many appear to be prepopulated from databases, or possibly "scraped" — copied wholesale — from other sites. Take this listing of San Francisco restaurants, for example: Most have little more than addresses.
    • MerchantCircle appears to be using automated systems to cold-call local merchants. Like Yelp, MerchantCircle touts user ratings as a reason for businesses to sign up for the site. But unlike Yelp, MerchantCircle isn't waiting for there to be any actual user reviews. For some time, MerchantCircle has been autodialing businesses in an effort to convince them that users may have left bad ratings about them on the site. Never mind that the reviews — and the users — may not exist in every case. For local businesses, which rely on the phone to attract customers and make sales, autodialing is a thousand times worse than email spam; wasting time with an automated system is the same, in their minds, as taking money from their pockets. Lying is just the icing on the cake.
    • MerchantCircle CEO Ben Smith promised to stop the autodialing — but it's continued. John Battelle, founder of the Federated Media online-ad network, contacted Smith about the practice in September 2006. Smith claimed "that he's on it." According to the comments businesses are still leaving on blog posts about MerchantCircle, the practice continues to this day.
    • The company is counting on search-engine optimization, or SEO — the art of tweaking websites to make them rank highly in search results — for traffic. So far, it's failed. But even if MerchantCircle's attempts at SEO worked, Google and the other search engines would rapidly catch on and banish MerchantCircle's pages from their indexes.
    • MerchantCircle's business model has evolved into a circle jerk: Rather than persuading actual users to visit its listings, MerchantCircle is styling itself as a social network for local businesses which link to each other's profiles on the site. But if you ran a local shop, would you rather raise your profile with the Chamber of Commerce, or get actual customers in the door? As with any such arrangement, this circle is likely to leave local businesses exhausted and unsatisfied.

      Which raises the question, why are Valley notables giving this company a hand? Among the company's investors and advisors are Scale Venture Partners, Disney's Steamboat Ventures, Ron Conway of Angel Investors, Auren Hoffman of Rapleaf, and — ironically enough — Chas Edwards, a vice president at Federated Media. His boss, Battelle, must be so proud.

    ]]>
    Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:17:58 PDT Tim Faulkner http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289913&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ TechCrunch hopes to turn its readers into women ]]> I haven't seen the actual demographics, but I'd be shocked if TechCrunch's readership, like every other tech site, is anything but crushingly male. Which makes Valleywag reader Mark Mercado's sighting of an ad for Fashion Bug, the discount women's retailer, on the tech-review site quite curious. Either Federated Media, TechCrunch's ad representative, is getting desperate and selling space to so-called "remnant" ad networks — the Ross Dress for Lesses of the online-advertising world — or Fashion Bug, in a savvy move, is marketing to cross-dressing entrepreneurs so desperate to get TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington's attention that they're willing to doll themselves up like Julia Allison, the New York tartlet who made a recent Bay Area tour.

    ]]>
    Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:08:25 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=287531&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Kevin Rose breaks up with John Battelle ]]> It's not you. It's me. We can still be friends, right? That's how I translate Digg founder Kevin Rose's blog post announcement that Digg is dropping Battelle's Federated Media as its online-ad rep and signing up with Microsoft. Says Rose:

    It's a deal similar to the one Facebook signed with Microsoft last year.
    That no doubt means that Microsoft ponied up a big upfront guarantee to win Digg's business. That kind of offer is naturally hard for Battelle's startup to compete with. But it's hard to get dumped for someone richer. And softening the blow by continuing to toss some scraps of business Battelle's way? That just makes things worse. Break up like a man, Kevin. (Photo by dfarber) ]]>
    Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:11:53 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282482&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ User trust is built by shilling ]]> search-conversation.jpgAm I the only one who still thinks "conversation" should mean "How's the family," "How 'bout them Yankees," and "Let's talk about our feelings" and not "I'm in bed with this company because..."? Federated Media (a competitor of Valleywag's parent company) started another "conversation" sponsored by one of the blog network's advertisers. In the last "conversation," bloggers wrote blurbs pushing Microsoft's slogan, "People Ready." The new blurbfest centers on how search services can win users' trust. The answer, according to "conversation" sponsor Hakia, seems to be "give them a poll to fill out and let them comment a bit." Bloggers including Techcrunch editor Michael Arrington and GigaOM manager Om Malik (who was supposedly sorry for his involvement in such a project) gave little quotes tailored to Hakia's message. None of this is evil, or even dishonest. It's just crap. The same kind of crap that supposedly led people to leave corporate-owned newspapers and TV for blogs that wouldn't spew it.

    Bonus! Hakia attached a song about "searching for better search." If you had a really great night last night, and you need a sledgehammer to bring you back into the desperate hopeless drudgery of your life, this song is better than "Birth School Work Death." One line goes, "Your childhood is posted on eBay, starting bids 25 cents."

    ]]>
    Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:35:28 PDT Nick Douglas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=274798&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ A Netscape warrior thinks better of tweaking Microsoft ]]> Late to the blogging game and caught in the throes of newbie enthusiasm, Netscape cofounder Marc Andreessen hasn't yet learned the virtues of thinking before clicking the "Publish" button. Here's the story of the post he quickly came to regret. Andreessen picked up a recent Valleywag item on Microsoft's "people ready" ad campaign. In an ethically questionable deal, Federated Media bloggers agreed to tout the slogan. That, in turn, inspired him to claim that blog.pmarca.com is "so not people-ready." (A Google search still shows the missing post.) The Andreessen of the '90s was a famous Microsoft trash-talker, and this seemed like a reversion to form - but not for long. Almost as soon as he wrote it, he reconsidered and deleted the posting. Could his cowardice have anything to do with the booming business that Opsware, his boring but modestly successful software company, does with the giant of Redmond? ]]> Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:57:24 PDT wagger1 http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=271592&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ John Battelle on the money ]]> john%20battelle%20web%20visionary.jpgIt's the usual fluffery in this BusinessWeek love note to John Battelle and his Federated Media, including the literal money shot: "Last year, [FM] sold more than $10 million in advertising for about 90 Web sites. This year, Battelle says it is on track to turn a profit and increase sales fivefold." Check the counter-quote from none other than Jason Calacanis, who dislikes the idea of not owning the blogs in the network: "The second you build your client's business past $500,000 a year, they hire their own sales force." Doesn't leave a lot of room to maneuver with recently acquired FM client Ask a Ninja, reputedly brought aboard with a $300,000 guarantee. That's not the best thing about this article, though.

    The BW missive actually brought the Battelle Watch blogger out of retirement. He points out that the writer of this BW article (Spencer E. Ante) also penned a review of James Ledbetter's book chronicling the flameout of Battelle's Industry Standard. Summary of review: book "good, if incomplete," Battelle "brilliant." In the current piece, Battelle also brags that "[FM client] Boing Boing is never going to get into the offices of General Motors. But Federated Media does all the time." Sounds like a challenge, BBers.

    ]]>
    Tue, 06 Feb 2007 06:00:46 PST Chris Mohney http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=234257&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Blogging for (Relatively Low) Profit! ]]> 2006_12_joeljohnson.jpgLOCKHART STEELE — Joel Johnson is one of my favorite bloggers. He helmed Gawker gadget blog Gizmodo for a few years, then oversaw all the Gawker tech sites before departing this past summer (damn him) for the greener pastures of Wired's website, where he's again managing bloggers (poor fool).

    But in his spare time this fall, Joel started a new men's blog, Dethroner. Its eerily simple business goal: make money, but not a fortune. Given the blog's increasing influence—ur-blogger Jason Kottke memorably praised Dethroner's "low level of desperation"—it's interesting to read Joel's three-month status report on the state of the business.

    He posted this on Dethroner earlier this week:

    Following typical blog launch patterns, we launched to an exceptionally strong burst of initial traffic, only to quickly fall to a lower but slowly rising rhythm, averaging around 16,000 page views a day as of last week. That's a solid but not stunning level of traffic; it's expected to remain at those levels or below through the end of the year, as holiday traffic numbers tend to be low in general, plus we're going to an abbreviated posting schedule next week.

    Our internal traffic goal is to quadruple traffic by Q2 of next year.

    At current traffic rates and average level of ad placement by Federated Media, we're making between one and two thousand dollars a month, with a infrastructure overhead of about $200 a month (for hosting and occasional web development costs). Amazon referral fees are generating between $50 and $300 a month. I do not currently take any funds from Dethroner as a business, and will be putting all revenue back into the site, primarily through the hiring of full-time writer.

    What does all this mean? Valleywag just said something nice about John Battelle's company!

    Read Joel's whole post for more thoughts on the microblog biz.

    State of the Blog t + 3 months [Dethroner]

    ]]>
    Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:10:16 PST lock http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222951&view=rss&microfeed=true