<![CDATA[Valleywag: Developers]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/valleywag.com.png <![CDATA[Valleywag: Developers]]> http://valleywag.com/tag/developers http://valleywag.com/tag/developers <![CDATA[ Widgetmaker: Lost developer enthusiam cuts Facebook's value by $10 billion ]]> Butwelikeourmoneyfacebook.jpgEarlier today, we reported that participation in Facebook's developer forum is down, most likely due to Facebook's new restrictions on Facebook-application spam. We praised these new rules, saying Facebook won't miss its lousiest apps. Now an executive from a major, well-funded widgetmaker tells us, "Your post misses the point." Before you reach for the "Block" button, hear him out:

FB's valuation is driven by the perception it can serve as a platform (or launching pad) for derivative businesses. Without that perception, FB is a $3-5 B company. Period. When developers lose enthusiasm for the "platform," every FB employee has their net worth cut by 67%.
]]>
Wed, 07 May 2008 13:40:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388208&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Finally, the craplets on Facebook begin to fail ]]> New accounts and activity on Facebook's developer forums are down dramatically since January, reports Adonomics founder Jesse Farmer. And as the above chart indicates, Facebook's users no longer add third-party Facebook applications as much as they did at the beginning of the year. Along with increased competition from social network Hi5 and consolidation into larger widgetmaking companies, Farmer blames the slowdown on Facebook for "instituting increasingly demanding and arbitrary rules on platform developers, which they then enforced selectively and for their own benefit." We agree the slowdown is likely the result of the new rules, but we don't so much blame Facebook as praise Facebook for them.

Building gimmicky widgets that serve no real use, third-party developers had too much success, too early, too easily, on Facebook's platform. For all his puffery, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is correct that useful applications could and should be built on the connections between people and their shared interests. Yet so far, I can't think of a Facebook application I've installed that I can't live without. So why should the developers who built so much junk continue to be successful? They shouldn't. And if Zuckerberg's new rules force these developers to dream as big as he does — sometimes awkwardly and in public — then good.

]]>
Wed, 07 May 2008 09:40:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388059&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The developers driving Facebook's redesign do it "Just For Fun" ]]> Makers of Facebook applications have seized control over the social network's latest redesign. So who are these mighty developers capable of bending the stubborn Mark Zuckerberg to their will? Among others, the makers of "You're a Hottie," which tops the "Recently Popular" list in Facebook's "Just For Fun" application category — the most popular on the site, according to this handy reminder from FlowingData. Here's CLZConcepts.com pitch for their popular app:

Think your friends are hot? Let them know by adding them to your 10 Hottest Friends List! Get friends to add you to boost your own Ranking!
]]>
Fri, 02 May 2008 11:20:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386570&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Zuckerberg's caving to Facebook developers proves he's no Bill Gates ]]> oldFBtab.jpgUpdated mockups reveal that Facebook has added a new tab to its soon-to-be-released user profiles. It's a small but telling detail that illustrates how the obsessively controlling Mark Zuckerberg has ceded power to independent Facebook-app developers. In his original plans for Facebook's redesign, Zuckerberg planned to integrate the Wall — the place where public messages from other users are displayed on user profiles — with Facebook's News Feed, which is where Facebook serves ads between "stories" about other users' activities. This integration was a way for Facebook to finally serve ads in the Wall, a placewhere users spend a great deal of their time on the site.

Developers, both small and large, told us they hated the idea. Still, since Facebook owns the platform, Zuckerberg should have been able to ignore their criticisms and protect Facebook's new moneymaking plan. Now, instead, there's a new tab on user profiles for just the News Feed. When he launched Facebook's platform, Zuckerberg drew comparisons to Bill Gates, the creator of another powerful platform. But Gates bullied developers, not the other way around.

]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 10:20:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386102&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How widgetmakers hijacked Zuckerberg's Facebook redesign ]]> FBAnnotatedPreviewThumb.jpgFacebook's redesign — originally planned for early April, but delayed due to objections from widgetmakers like RockYou, Slide, and Zynga — is no longer a Mark Zuckerberg production. Third-party developers have hijacked it. A source close to the redesign process tells us "Facebook has made some changes to the original design, reflecting developer concerns." Below, screenshots of Zuckerberg's original plans for the redesign, annotated with the objections Facebook-application startups raised.

FBAnnotatedPreview1.jpg
FBAnnotatedPreview2.jpg

  1. Current Facebook profiles allow users to move application boxes around their profile wherever they like. Zuckerberg's new profiles won't allow as much customization. "The question is whether users will like the return to a uniform "profile" that looks the same for everyone. I would bet that users actually prefer to customize the look & feel of their profiles," an exec at one of the major widgetmakers tells us.
  2. Zuckerberg wants to integrate the News Feed with the Wall. One developer tells us: "Mixing in 'X wrote on Y's funwall" along with more personal messages from friends may deteriorate the quality of the new wall/feed feature as a whole."
  3. Facebook widgetmakers hate the tabs on Zuckerberg's new profile. One complains that most apps will suffer due to them: "By default a few apps will get their own tab and most will be relegated to the 'more' tab." Another source tells us this is one area where Zuckerberg has definitely caved to developer pressure.
    Facebook has some improvements in the latest version which should mitigate some of this effect on developers. Nevertheless, a substantial fraction of traffic to developers' apps will likely be lost as navigation to new tabs is unlikely to equal current profile traffic.

  4. This search bar better not disappear like it does in the other profile preview. If it does, one developer asks:
    How will users easily find their applications and search for new ones as well as do a quick search of their friends? Getting users to adopt to such a massive change without any major problems is going to be a huge x-factor.

]]>
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:20:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385625&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Confabulous: Sun gets business plan from underpants gnomes ]]> underpants-gnomes.jpgValleywag conference-season coverage kicks off with EDDRC. Looks like these poor folks could use a backchannel. Sez our source:

So Evans Data is holding their Developer Relations Conference here in SF at the fabulous Argent Hotel, site of many a drunken Java developer's undoing. Bill Roth from BEA keynoted in a rather muted way, refusing to elbo the competition in this mixed crowd, unusual for him. But the real excitement is that, as these valley execs navel gaze for the crowd, there's almost no one in the audience who doesn't have their email client open. With all the key clicks, you'd think that these people are taking copious notes. Wrong. Everyone is bored with hearing about how to form a develolper community. They'd much rather work.

And:

Dear god in heaven, Jean Elliott, Sun's director of developer marketing just told a roomfull of evans data attendees about the Underpants gnomes from South Park. Specifically, she referenced their business plan: Step 1: Steal underpants Step 2: Step 3: Profit!

Sounds an awful lot like Sun's current business model!

]]>
Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:39:28 PST ndouglas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=153301&view=rss&microfeed=true