<![CDATA[Valleywag: Adobe]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/valleywag.com.png <![CDATA[Valleywag: Adobe]]> http://valleywag.com/tag/adobe http://valleywag.com/tag/adobe <![CDATA[ PDFs now as rock-solid secure as ActiveX ]]> It's a verified bug: PDF files can be used to take over your PC. Adobe's mistake was adding support for ever-sloppy JavaScript inside the once-benign PDF format. Core Security, the company that outed the vulnerability, says, "An attacker could put malicious code in JavaScript embedded in a PDF and [...] could manipulate the program's memory allocation pattern and trigger the vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user." Great. I can hardly wait to reinstall Paul's PC after he pretends to read another of those ethics-in-journalism PDFs.

]]>
Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:20:00 PST Tim the IT Guy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076487&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Adobe really really really wants Flash everywhere ]]> Why is Adobe dropping licensing restrictions and fees for its Flash video player? To prod Steve Jobs into adding Flash to the iPhone. Maybe Adobe should just keep resubmitting that iPhone Flash player application to the iTunes Store. [Wired]

]]>
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:00:00 PDT Alaska Miller http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5065142&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Skip Intro now officially dead ]]> Google began indexing the text context of Flash animations, movies and interfaces in Web pages a few months ago. But no Google improvement is complete until the professional SEO's document how to game the system. Here's the first well-done guide to getting your world class Flash content the placement it deserves on the Internet. Author Brian Ussery steals one of Google's best tricks: If you're going to tell a bunch of techies how to lie, blanket it in soothing geek imagery by using examples tied to science. NASA is good. Executive summary for globalists: "Google doesn’t seem to translate text content in Flash files, especially when text is supplied by a server or some other third party source." So it's kind of Speak English or Die for now.

]]>
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:20:00 PDT Paul Boutin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5063186&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Microsoft to sneak in a launch of Silverlight 2.0 ]]> Yes, all anyone can talk about are Apple's new laptops. Always prone to squandering a PR opportunity, Microsoft is set to debut the next version of its answer to Adobe's Flash — Silverlight, the video player everyone talks about but no one has installed. Silverlight 2.0 has digital rights management software to power multimedia sites, skinning capabilities for the player, deep zoom, as well as finally Mac and Linux support for Firefox and even Chrome a long list of features that don't matter. [PC Magazine]

]]>
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:20:00 PDT Alaska Miller http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5062869&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Adobe building iPhone Flash player ]]> A senior Adobe engineer confirmed the obvious at a Flash developer's conference in England that yes, they're building a Flash player especially for the iPhone. Paul Betlem from Adobe balked at saying the app was sure to be built into Apple's Safari browser that ships with the phone, but it seems a certainty. Flash websites and video clips are no longer the "Skip Intro" bane of the Web. Apple went out of its way to enable YouTube on the first iPhone. Enabling the iPhone to work on any Flash-based website seems the obvious next step in removing the functional differences between phone and laptop. (Photoillustration by Jackson West)

]]>
Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:00:00 PDT Paul Boutin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5057064&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Adobe: Amazon.com goof allowed free movie downloads ]]> Amazon.com's Video On Demand service, which allows you to preview and purchase streaming videos online, uses Adobe's Flash Media Server to deliver the video. Late last week, Reuters reported that hackers had discovered an exploit that would allow users to turn the free preview into the full stream, allowing folks to watch movies for free using software like Replay Media Catcher from Applian. Adobe took issue with Reuters' contention that Flash isn't secure — instead suggesting it was Amazon's fault for not enabling various security options such as streaming encryption and player verification. Why did Adobe choose to blame a customer instead of quietly fixing the problem behind the scenes? Probably seemed easier.

]]>
Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:40:00 PDT Jackson West http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056855&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dear Adobe, we hate you ]]> DearAdobe.com catalogs and organizes by popularity and product bite-sized rants against Adobe, the software company that creates products like Photoshop, Illustrator and Flash which have become industry standards for creative professionals. Messages seem to convey one idea over and over: Dear Adobe, Your bloatware is slow and costs too much.

]]>
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:20:00 PDT Jackson West http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048403&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NBC dumps Microsoft Silverlight after Olympics ]]> NBC streamed all its NBCOlympics.com videos using Microsoft's Silverlight backend tech, but the network dumped Microsoft before last night's NFL kickoff — streamed live over NBCSports.com and NFL.com — opting to use Adobe Flash instead. Why? Because, as SAI notes, while 40 million US visitors to NBCOlympics.com didn't have Silverlight installed, Adobe Flash is already installed on some 98 percent of Internet-connected computers. NBC's move didn't pay off last night. The feed was unwatchable over a broadband connection, serving up freeze fames, blurry action and skipping back and forth as the it tried to buffer.

]]>
Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:20:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5045822&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Amazon.com's video on demand more "piddling" than "streaming" ]]> While Amazon.com makes no claims as to the quality of video from its new "video on demand" online streaming service being comparable to DVD quality, a measly 1.2 megabit-per-second data rate is still laughable. To put it in perspective, standard-definition DVDs typically run well over 6Mbps (Apple, also risibly, calls the 5Mbps offerings from iTunes "HD," purely based on pixel dimensions and not data depth). And based on your connection speed, Amazon might deliver even less digital resolution. All of this for up to $14.99 to "own" a movie stored wrapped in Adobe's Flash copy protection. Granted, Amazon is hindered by the slow broadband connections typical in American households, but keeping the bitrate low also keeps bandwidth costs down — and margins high.

]]>
Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:00:00 PDT Jackson West http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5045747&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Adobe-Yahoo rumor? Confab thrower's attention grab ]]> Professional linkbaiter Guy Kawasaki reports a "juicy tidbit" from the Gnomedex conference in Seattle: "Adobe is scratching their collective chins and in deep thought considering a Yahoo acquisition." We don't believe it. With a $23.61 billion market cap, Adobe isn't exactly in a position to spend $40 billion on Yahoo, even its stock price has finally sunk below where it was when Microsoft made its offer. So why the rumor? Look to its source: Chris Pirillo — the guy who puts on the Gnomedex conference, of which we admit to only a vague awareness before Pirillo sent a Twitter message about the rumor and got everyone talking about it. And him. And his conference.

]]>
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:20:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5040416&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Microsoft now being sued for patent infringement over Silverlight ]]> Silverlight, Microsoft's buggy effort to tackle Adobe's Flash video technology, has another hiccup on the road to mass acceptance. Gotuit, a video-technology startup, has filed suit against Microsoft for patent infringement. Gotuit will be represented by Spencer Hosie, a law firm which has tangled with Team Redmond before and managed to squeeze out a $60 million settlement for Burst.com. Don't even know what Silverlight is? Read the primer so you can bluff your way out of a gaggle of Google employees. [News.com]

]]>
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:40:00 PDT Alaska Miller http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026356&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Iran hacks world media with Photoshop ]]> Left: The head-turning photo that appeared all over the world yesterday. Right, the original photo. The New York Times, which ran the altered version, explains how the photo spread "from the Web site of Sepah News, the media arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards," to "the front pages of The Los Angeles Times, The Financial Times, The Chicago Tribune and several other newspapers as well as on BBC News, MSNBC, Yahoo News, NYTimes.com and many other major news Web sites." We lucked out by running other photos for variety. (Photo by Sepah News via AP)

]]>
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:00:00 PDT Paul Boutin http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023949&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Google, Yahoo start to search Flash ]]> Adobe has begun work with Google and Yahoo to enable their search engines to index Flash content. What that means for the rest of us: more whizbang Web site designs on e-commerce sites that previously stuck with HTML in order to remain searchable. [PaidContent]

]]>
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:20:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021093&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Adobe's revenue is up, but struggling to make a market out of mobile ]]> Year-over-year revenues are up 19 percent at Adobe in the most recent quarter, driven mostly by sales of the new CS3 versions of popular applications such as Photoshop. (Even bloggers use it!) But there was little growth in revenues derived from mobile markets as the company struggles to make its Flash Web-video technology the go-to media software for phones and other devices. On the iPhone front, the company has Flash running on an emulator, but in Cupertino, Apple is developing its own alternative. [ZDNet]

]]>
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:00 PDT Jackson West http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017260&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Joost's last, best hope nixed by Adobe ]]> The latest iteration of Joost, the once-hot, now decidedly not video startup from the people who brought you Skype, will work in your browser — but only if you download a plugin from Joost. And while Joost struggles to find good content, Adobe is rolling file sharing into its Flash player, beating Joost's new plugin to the punch. NBC has worked with file-sharing content delivery platforms in the past, and Hulu — a site backed with quality content — uses Flash. I'm sure the Joost developers are tech whizzes, but even our journalist math puts them on the wrong side of this equation. (Photo by Job D.)

]]>
Thu, 22 May 2008 16:20:00 PDT Jackson West http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392790&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tech's worst workspace: Mozilla ]]> What's so bad about Mozilla's Toronto workspace? Besides the fluorescent lighting, the colorless white walls and the folding tables, the worst thing about Mozilla's Toronto workspace is how we're sure management would improve it. With corporate graffiti, company logos and too many colors. That was management's trick at Facebook and look where readers ranked it in our poll on tech's ten worst workspaces — as tech's second-worst workspace, just after Mozilla. Check out the full list, below.

  1. Mozilla
  2. Facebook
  3. Mahalo
  4. DoubleClick
  5. Yahoo
  6. Microsoft
  7. Google
  8. LinkedIn
  9. Jajah
  10. Adobe
]]>
Mon, 19 May 2008 12:20:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=391711&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Rank tech's 10 worst workspaces ]]> After reviewing our post "The 10 worst workspaces in tech," commenter AdmNaismith described Facebook's office, pictured above, as "foggy, dank, dim, and utterly depressing." Commenter mothra1 hated Yahoo's New York offices more: "They suck! Lifeless and impersonal. Kinda like the douchebags who still actually work there." Meanwhile, Adobe apologist BlairHapjo told us we "clearly didn't get past Adobe's lobby," and the rest of the office features "Aeron chairs, real offices (with doors!), big picture windows." For us, the worst offices we found on Office Snapshots and elsewhere were the the ones that try too hard to seem Internet-hip, like Jajah and Google. Now it's time to settle the disputes. Below, vote for your least favorite and help us rank tech's 10 most dismal places to work:

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
Fri, 16 May 2008 06:00:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390973&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The 10 worst workspaces in tech ]]> We've toured the top 10 workspaces in tech. Now, we've gone back to Office Snapshots to find the 10 worst. What makes them so bad? Some offend with exposed fluorescent lights, gray cubicles and a dystopian corporate sheen. But others, with their pseudo-hip graffiti, kindergarten toys and plastic decorations — all in a desperate attempt to seem "Internet-y" — come off even worse. We'll start with Yahoo's New York digs.

]]>
Thu, 08 May 2008 18:00:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=388566&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Microsoft hire Mark Hamburg hates Windows ]]> mark_hamburg_enters_photoshop_hall_of_fame.jpgMark Hamburg, pictured here accepting a Photoshop Hall of Fame award, on being hired away from Adobe to work on user experience at Microsoft: "Given that I find the current Windows experience really annoying and yet I keep having to deal with it, this opportunity was a little too interesting to turn down." [News.com]

]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 15:20:00 PDT Jackson West http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386189&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Microsoft hires father of Photoshop away from Adobe ]]> Engineer Mark Hamburg has left Adobe for Microsoft. Known as the "architect" of Adobe, Hamburg is credited by the Photoshop Hall of Fame with "programmer logic and the compositing models that unite Photoshop's imaging effects to specific features such as the history palette, free transform, screen caching, and shapes." Hamburg will move to Seattle and focus on "user experience." [LightroomNews]

]]>
Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:20:00 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=384831&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Silverlight bugs sign of growing user base, or bad code? ]]> Wacky developer Brent SimmonsCat-loving software developer Brent Simmons parses a lot of error logs maintaining NetNewsWire, an application for reading RSS feeds, and it's a fine perch on which to spot trends online. Lately he's been seeing more and more browsers borked by Microsoft plugin Silverlight, the software giant's tragically late multimedia competitor to Adobe's Flash. This could be a good sign for Microsoft in terms of a growing user base, but personally I've yet to see an installation of Silverlight in the wild, even on regular trips to Microsoft Country. I'm guessing the problems are more likely due to bloated code, a monopolist's tendency to ignore industry standards, or both. Simmons, for what it's worth, wishes a pox upon both houses because users blame his product when the big-shots' bugs cause problems with his product. (Photo from Brent Simmons)

]]>
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:40:00 PDT Jackson West http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381960&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Microsoft mobile devices will have Flash before the iPhone ]]> Some fanboys say the iPhone actually provides something better than the "real Internet," because it lacks Flash. You kidding? What's the point of Internet-on-the-can without all that embedded Web video? While his holiness Steve Jobs won't go there, Microsoft mobile exec Derek Snyder will, signing Microsoft to license Adobe's Flash Lite technology.

]]>
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:00:57 PDT Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368641&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Steve Jobs: Adobe's Flash "performs too slow to be useful" on iPhone ]]> AP080115030571.jpgSome whiners say what the iPhone provides isn't the real Internet, because it lacks Flash. No kidding, donkeys: It's way better. Thank you, Steve Jobs, for saving us from Flash websites — the 2008 version of the <BLINK> tag. [Macworld]

]]>
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:20:42 PST Jordan Golson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364246&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Facebook adds Flash on its way to MySpace hell ]]> facebookflash.pngThe best thing about Facebook is that it isn't a blinking mass of glittery images and horrendous, unreadable "designs," right? Perhaps not for long. Now application developers can use Adobe's Flash in their work. This will be nice for musicians who want to embed their music or whatever, but how long until auto-play emo starts blasting from my speakers while I'm trying to stalk catch up with old acquaintances? Please, Mark Zuckerberg, I beg of you: Keep these people in line. God forbid Facebook ever become as ugly — or as popular — as MySpace.

]]>
Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:40:40 PST Jordan Golson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359709&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ustream.tv negotiating $50 million sale to Microsoft ]]> ustreamlogo.pngSources tell Valleywag that lifecasting startup Ustream.tv is in advanced discussions with Microsoft to acquire the lifecasting service for more than $50 million, but there are other companies in the bidding as well. Ustream is currently raising a very large initial round of VC financing, and Microsoft is attempting to grab them prefunding for a cheap price. Our tipster also mentions that Microsoft would use Ustream as a way to promote its Adobe Flash competitor, Silverlight. Ustream has raised around $2 million from angel investors, and seems to have hit the market at just the right time.

ustreampic.pngThe disastrous beta launch of Yahoo Live puts the spotlight on firms like Ustream.tv and Justin.tv. There are more than a few companies that could easily integrate a streaming video service into their content strategy, including Microsoft, Apple, YouTube, or any number of camera and PC manufacturers.

Ustream focuses more on broadcasts of events, rather than lifecasts — those intensely boring 24/7 video streams of people's lives. Ustream has streamed several major concerts, including some from Hannah Montana, and has been used by a number of presidential candidates, including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, to broadcast exclusive events. The Republican National Convention will be on Ustream this summer. This focus on "eventcasting" could make it more respectable than a lifecasting startup — and more tempting to a major buyer like Microsoft.

]]>
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:17:26 PST Jordan Golson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354140&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Wear tinfoil hats when using Adobe products ]]> You're not the only one watching what you do in Adobe Creative Suite 3, the company's ubiquitous photo-and-design software package. Adobe is watching you, too. According to this screenshot from Uneasysilence, launching Adobe CS3 triggers communication between your computer and behavioral analytics firm Omniture. (For starters, Adobe could have chosen a partner with a less ominously Foucauldian name.)

Adobe confirms the function, saying they use information gleaned about user behavior to gain "business insight into how to create better user experiences." Don't want to be their guinea pig? Omniture lets you opt out.

]]>
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:20:26 PST Nicholas Carlson http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338011&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Adobe CEO quits abruptly ]]> Bruce ChizenWhy is CEO Bruce Chizen stepping down from Adobe next month? Normally, CEOs give a bit more than three weeks' notice. The Adobe press release announcing his replacement, Shantanu Narayen, trips over itself to stress the company's supposedly strong financial performance. One obvious conclusion: Chizen knows something about the software company's future we don't — and he, and Adobe, aren't telling.

]]>
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:16:32 PST Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=321828&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Awaiting Oprah ]]> YouTubeOprah.jpgGod, it's a dull Monday. The most interesting events in the tech world are happening in Berlin or Denver. For anyone who's still in town, here's the best we can offer on the Valleywag Calendar.

  • There's some developer camp at Adobe. Flash! Air! Leah Culver might even show! [Adobe]
  • Go for a walk with egoblogger Robert Scoble and Zooomr evangelist Thomas Hawk as they take pictures and yammer on and on and on and on and oh my god, I can't believe we're recommending this to you. Never mind. Take a camera and photowalk your way to your closest bar and take a shot of tequila to make you forget about this travesty. [Upcoming]
  • Set your TiVos! YouTube founders Chad Hurley and Steve Chen will be on megatalkshow Oprah tomorrow. But, if you miss it, we wager you'll be able to catch clips online. [Oprah]

Got a to-do that's a must-do? Send it to calendar@valleywag.com. Check out more events on our Google Calendar:

]]>
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:30:13 PST Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318742&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ What you need to know about Microsoft's Popfly ]]> Popfly, as useful as a rubber duckySoftware giant Microsoft is getting the attention of the geek blogosphere for moving its drag-and-drop Web mashup development tool, Popfly, into public testing. Why? Because it has a cute name? Because it's being pitched to everyday Internet users who aren't developers — women, even? (As if women don't program now.) Because it's being pitched as an easy way to build widgets for popular social networks MySpace and Facebook? For all those reasons, sure. But that's not why you should care about Popfly.


On some levels, Popfly is nothing new. It's similar to Yahoo Pipes, Apple's soon-to-be-released widget builder Dashcode, personalization tools in various Google properties, and any number of new portals which allow you to build your own web applications. None of these Web mashup builders have attracted the hoped-for audience.

Why? Nondevelopers simply do not develop applications; hence the "non-" prefix. When they do, they build bad applications when there are plenty of existing, free alternatives. Social networks, the Web, and desktops are already overrun by thousands of redundant, useless widgets. This crowded market is dominated by a few quality Web applications built by professional developers who do it for a living. The next innovation is not going to come from an amateur using a dumbed-down beta product.

If someone tries to get you excited about a Popfly widget, the odds are high five other widgets performing the same function already exist. The odds will be low that the Popfly widget will be the best of the class.

But Microsoft should, nevertheless, be excited about Popfly. Rarely has Redmond produced such a simple, visually appealing tool for developers. After playing with Popfly, talented developers will likely migrate to more powerful tools. But Microsoft is badly losing in the battle with Adobe's Flash. Anything that gives Popfly, and the Silverlight technology it's based on, a bit of buzz will redound to Microsoft's long-term benefit. Even if you and I never end up finding a single Popfly-based application worth using.

]]>
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:20:03 PDT Tim Faulkner http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312566&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Adobe loves you even if you're drunk ]]> "We're an enabler of Web 2.0." — Adobe CEO Bruce Chizen, at the Web 2.0 Summit, describing his software-tool company's supportive role in inflating the bubble. In the morning, Chizen will make phone calls to conference goers to explain that Web 2.0 didn't really mean what it said last night.

]]>
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:32:32 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312153&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Big shakeup at Microsoft? ]]> According to the BusinessofVideo.com blog, Microsoft is shaking up its audio- and video-software business:
Today, Microsoft made some major company changes in multiple divisions of their business. Some long time execs including Amir Majidimehr and others are affected and multiple divisions have been reorged. Lots of changes that will affect multiple product lines. I expect we'll see the changes announced shortly, if not tomorrow.
Majidimehr, who's been in charge of big parts of Microsoft's multimedia strategy over the years, may be paying the price for letting the software giant get overtaken in online video. The rise of Adobe's Flash as the online-video technology of choice for sites like YouTube has made Microsoft's Windows Media largely irrelevant.

]]>
Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:11:00 PDT Owen Thomas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307374&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Microsoft's attempt to catch up with Adobe's ... ]]> Scott Guthrie's blog] ]]> Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:47:27 PDT Tim Faulkner http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297551&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ Adobe's latest Flash move could be the death of amateur Web video ]]> adobe_logo.gifYippee! No more crappy, blurry YouTube videos! No more pixelated garbage filling every corner of the Web! Adobe's addition of the advanced H.264 high-definition codec — "codec" being a fancy way of saying "video algorithm" — to its popular Flash software. Flash, of course, has become the ubiquitous means of distributing video on the Web. Adding H.264 will finally bring high-quality moving images into the Web mainstream, and put an end to the rein of amateurism in online video. Or will it? Not so fast.

H.264 makes it possible for dramatic quality improvements in Internet video, it's true. However, most loser-generated content is still being produced with crappy cameras, on home computers with cheap editing software. The update to Flash will not create a tidal wave of better content. It only removes one of many roadblocks.

And, needless to say, a more advanced algorithm won't improve the subject matter of Web videos. YouTube will remain just as inane and crappy as before. The difference between professional and amateur content, however, will become more and more distinct. We'll still be inundated with videos of dressed-up pets and teenagers lip syncing two feet away from the camera (always original and entertaining). We'll just be more aware that we're watching crap.

For Adobe, it's a timely move. Content producers were beginning to eschew Flash video's universality for higher-quality download formats; startups like Joost were hoping to develop alternative video delivery mechanisms by emphasizing better image resolution; and Microsoft thought it saw an open door to compete with Flash through Silverlight, its competing multimedia platform which supports another HD-video format. Adobe just closed the door on competitors and cemented its control of online video for the foreseeable future. And if it renders people's home videos that much more tiresome, all the better.

]]>
Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:06:11 PDT Tim Faulkner http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291850&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ So, that weird spinny semaphore public art ... ]]> The Crying of Lot 49. Fun fact: The two dudes who broke the code met when they both attended "a workshop on how to flirt with women." [San Jose Mercury News] ]]> Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:10:45 PDT Megan McCarthy http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=290004&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ Ancient acrobat statues puzzle Googlers ]]> google%20acrobat.jpgAs a (perhaps) final coda to the Googleplex map errata, lots of readers phoned in with declarations or speculations regarding the acrobat statues outside Building 45. Were they in fact leftovers from when Adobe lived there, and did they have some nominal relationship to Adobe's Acrobat products? Or did early explorers find these statues in the Spanish colonial days and decide this would be an excellent place for an office park?

Commenter rheiser says:

Google occupies buildings that Adobe once occupied when they were in Mt. View across from the Amphitheater parking lot. I haven't looked to see if the statue we used to call "Gumby" is there anymore in front of the green buildings.
An email tipster responds:
Those certainly look like the acrobat sculptures that used to be outside the Adobe buildings — I used to pass by them every day when i worked at Sun in the early 90's. I had always assumed that Acrobat was named after the sculptures ....
Further corroboration comes from commenter spacemonkey:
A potentially interesting factoid: The statues referred to in #10 are holdovers from when Adobe occupied these buildings, and are why it's called 'Acrobat'.
However, commenter pimpmyPR calls BS on the whole suburban legend:
Total coincidence. No relation to Acrobat the product. However, like most big tech companies Adobe has an agreement with it's local government (now city of San Jose) to provide some level of public art in its environs. Adobe now has a couple of rusty sculptures in front of its San Jose HQ. And that funny light thing on top of its building. Funnily enough Apple has a similar agreement with Cupertino. But Steve Jobs took down the art (it was a collection of big software icons in front of Infinite Loop) because he didn't like it.
This theory seems likely, as apparently the acrobrats prefigured Adobe, according to another mail-in:
I don't know whether or not that building was ever Adobe, but I do remember when Bldg 45 was owned and occupied by Sun, back when the Google Campus was SGI. I used to work for SETI (yes, *that* SETI), which was in the building just on the other side of Landings from the one marked marked "1965 Charleston" on your map at that time, and drove by those statues every day. I always thought they were a bit odd, since Sun isn't in the habit of littering their campus with giant kids. Except for the executives, of course.
Zing! Anyone know if ye olde Sun was responsible for the acrobat kids, or what? Is there a plaque on the damn things, at least? Drop the knowledge.

]]>
Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:20:44 PST Chris Mohney http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=234761&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Google ganks Adobe art? ]]> google%20acrobat.jpgItem 10 on our map of the Googleplex is a pair of circus-y statues outside Building 45. A reader reminisces:
I remember those sculptures of acrobats outside of an Adobe building. Perhaps building 45 used to be used by Adobe, and the artworks remain? I had wondered at the time if there was a correlation between the name Adobe Acrobat and the sculptures.
Provenance call! Know where the acrobat statues came from? Say so.

]]>
Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:20:02 PST Chris Mohney http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=234627&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Adobe InDenial ]]>

My regular day job is graphic design (if you guessed editor, you were wrong), currently I'm freelancing at a company in downtown San Francisco for the time being. The marketing firm is stocked with the newish Intel-powered iMacs, and being a designer those iMacs are mostly running the Adobe CS2 suite; Illustrator, Photoshop and InDesign.

We brought up an issue to our IT guy about the dialogs in InDesign displaying weird repeating numbers after the decimal place (shown here). The tech ran all the OS and Adobe application updates and spent some time on Adobe's Knowledgebase scouring the support documents for a solution. After coming up empty-handed we called Adobe's tech support, hit speakerphone and started reading War and Peace. As I finished the venerable tome, a support person chimed in and we explained our situation, and this was the response:

Adobe Support: "Yeah it's a known issue with the Intel iMacs, you'll have to wait for CS3 to have it fixed. We're slated to ship it sometime in 2007."

Us: "That's a cartload of horse pucky. Is there anything else we can do?"

Adobe Support: "Go on Craigslist and buy an older Mac."

Us: "You people are dumb, greedy assh...{click}."

Methinks it like a weasel. Don't forget Adobe, Express lost market share because of Quark's disinterest in fixing their buggy software, it can happen to you too.

]]>
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:37:42 PDT rabruzzo http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=210500&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Remainders: Dude! You got a cake! ]]>

  • Today's "Reason that San Francisco is cooler than San Jose" is a warning to vegetarians: In Silicon Valley, waiters forcibly stuff meat down your throat. [Metroactive]
  • Apparently everyone who didn't know about the Adobe/Microsoft fight over the PDF format has their heads in the sand. Yeah, they're all probably worrying about obscure news this week, like the US killing the world's leading terrorist. [Planet PDF]
  • Thanks again, SloshCon sponsors! To everyone else: If you want to give people money to drink, please sponsor the Gnomedex parties coming up in July. [Ponzarelli]
  • Is the Glam.com blog network scamming its writers? (Ha, name a blog network that isn't.) A tipster says, "Apparently their $11m in funding doesn't cover paying out a few cents to their partners." [Celebitchy]
  • Songwriter Billy Bragg takes his music off Myspace, saying the site's terms and conditions let Rupert Murdoch's media empire re-use all posted music without paying a cent in royalties. One wonders if News Corp would ever get away with acting on that clause, but either way, YAY FOR LEAVING MYSPACE. [Register]
  • Pictured: Best. Caption. Ever. The Register snarks at Dell for throwing Wall Street Journal editor Don Clark...a birthday party. [Register]
]]>
Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:05:11 PDT Nick Douglas http://valleywag.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=179504&view=rss&microfeed=true