"Cathy Brooks is a typically unapologetic Silicon Valley Web addict," writes Brad Stone in the New York Times. "Last week alone, she produced more than 40 pithy updates on the text messaging service Twitter, uploaded two dozen videos to various video sharing sites, posted seven photographs on the Yahoo image service Flickr and one item to the online community calendar Upcoming." Usually, when one identifies a friend as an addict, an intervention is in order. But Stone, who seems to have spent so much time in San Francisco's tech circles that he's gone native, suggests more technology instead: Specifically, FriendFeed, which gathers all of this online activity in one place, making it marginally easier for Brooks's benighted friends to keep up with her online logorrhea.
Brooks is employed by Seesmic, a videomail startup, so some of the "two dozen videos" she made could arguably be seen as all in a day's work. But the rest? The mainstream readers of the Times must wonder what people like Brooks do all day. One supposes they could sign up on FriendFeed to find out, but they, unlike the people of the Valley, have real jobs. Brooks, for her part, makes no apologies for her online chattiness: Her website sums up her career from a first-grade report card: "Cathy likes to participate in any project, so long as she gets to talk." In that, she has found a community of like minds.
"The question from our standpoint is, how you find signal in the noise?" asks Peter Fenton, a VC backer of FriendFeed at Benchmark Capital. That assumes that there is any signal. Such is the complaint of Michael Arrington, who bemoans his 954 unread Facebook messages, and demands that Facebook make changes to accommodate him. Has it ever occurred to Arrington that he is, in the argot of product managers, an "edge case"? Entrepreneurs desperate for coverage, and aware that he never reads email, are trying a new way to reach him — and Arrington, in his compulsive neophilia, actually tries out the new medium, for a while. He then quickly tires of it, and throws a tantrum. Catering to such a person's whims is no way to run a company.
Is information overload really anything more than a self-inflicted disease of the Valley? I doubt it. But to the extent it is, Facebook is far better poised to solve the problem than a startup like FriendFeed. The Times mistakenly reports that Facebook is playing catch-up in gathering up its users' online activities from across the Web. Balderdash. It's just done a lousy job of marketing its ability to do so.
The technology behind Beacon — the Facebook feature which ruined Christmas for some Facebook users, by revealing their online purchases, and has gotten Facebook sued for allegedly violating a Blockbuster video-renter's privacy — is now being used to report posts to Twitter, Digg, Yelp, and Flickr. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg botched Beacon by presenting it as an advertising technology last fall. His recent spin that it was a technology meant for programmers, not Madison Avenue types, hasn't taken hold. It's likely Facebook will have to drop the Beacon name altogether before it successfully revives the technology.
But Facebook's News Feed is the most logical place to gather together the sum of its users' online activity. The users, after all, are already there. FriendFeed might make a logical acquisition for the likes of Microsoft, Yahoo, or most likely of all, Google (its founders are all ex-Googlers). But a radical paradigm for the future of communication? Sorry, Zuckerberg got there first.
(Photo by Brian Solis)
.jpg)






Comments
This article was under discussion yesterday on Twitter, but only in that the NYT seems to have found a non-addict. Even a lightweight can manage 20 Tweets before breakfast, and while I don't post videos, I DO post Valleywag comments, which demonstrates even higher addiction, doesn't it? Wasn't Scoble available for an interview that day?
Am I the only one who doesn't want to give these fly-by-night web 2.0 companies (Mint, especially) the passwords to access all my personal data?
"...and Arrington, in his compulsive neophilia, actually tries out the new medium, for a while. He then quickly tires of it, and throws a tantrum."
Scoble and others do the same thing, and with such regularity that it is hard not to suspect something more than just tech-tard enthusiasm going on. Maybe one time in ten these things turn into advertising deals, or maybe there are somewhat informal "options" involved in some of the companies too tiny to have to do formal reporting on such things.
Whatever... eventually the "journalists" who engage in this bipolar behavior will lose credibility. Already I find them not so much a source for what's good, but just what's new, leaving quite a void for someone to fill who has the technical credentials to make good judgment calls rather than just jumping on the latest bandwagon.
macbeach: I've never taken a single dollar from anyone other than Seagate. I try these things out because I like trying out new things and seeing whether or not they work. FriendFeed is very interesting. Why? Well, I found this headline on FriendFeed.
Scoble, are you sure you didn't find this article ego searching your name?
Scoble: I didn't accuse anybody of anything, just said it LOOKS suspicious.
What Friendfeed thing do I subscribe to in order to get Valleywag comments? So far I'm only subscribed to YOU and I might as well still be using Twitter as most of the posts are about as useful as what people had for lunch (if in fact that is not what the post is about).
What you folks in the echo chamber fail to realize is that in most cases these things will never catch on with a mainstream user base.
There just seems to be too little between the try-everything-once Scoble and the trying-to-make-my-printer work Mossberg.
I'm trying to help you guys out here.
"Last week alone, she produced more than 40 pithy updates on the text messaging service Twitter, uploaded two dozen videos to various video sharing sites, posted seven photographs on the Yahoo image service Flickr and one item to the online community calendar Upcoming."
Sounds like nice work if you can get it.
What is the connection, exactly, between seesmic and friendfeed? I know there is one, because every single seesmic user is also a friendfeed user. If it was addressed in the article, sorry tl;dr
Can someone demo friendfeed for me - I can't see the point of it. Do I have to have friends to make it work?
Put it on MySpace for people to give a shit. OH WAIT that's like, against the rules.
We're also getting too old to be cool. Just fucking pay me money already.
Friendfeed is for people on ADD/ADHD. Even if you have few friends, the amount of useless data that it gives you is enormous! Stay clear of that tool! It's just an RSS reader with a "social" feel to it.
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?