Google reported revenues of $4.8 billion for the quarter ended December 31, representing a 51 percent increase over fourth quarter 2006 revenues of $3.2 billion and a 14 percent increase over third quarter 2007 revenues of $4.2 billion. Net of payments made to partners who carry Google's ads on their websites, the company's revenues were $3.39 billion. Those numbers fell short of expectations of analysts polled by Thomson Financial, who believed Google would post earnings of $4.44 a share on $3.45 billion in revenue. Google reported fourth-quarter profits of $1.2 billion, up from $1.1 billion in the third quarter of 2007.
Google's 51 percent revenue rise falls short of expectations
1:11 PM on Thu Jan 31 2008
By Nicholas Carlson
812 views
11 comments












Comments
And the stock has gotten trashed. Down 8-9% after hrs.
"Too damn easy" and the stock drops 8%.
Nice analysis, quality. They actually missed both net revenue as well as EPS targets -- good reporting.
Exactly, why are so many blog journalists blinded by Google? Fox News/Conservatives = Valleywag/Google.
Don't be too hard on him...he drank the Google Koolade long ago. Another of the tech horsemen to be beaten down...
Google forever! They're the Duran Duran of the tech game, that Sergey reminds me so much of Simon LeBon.
<3 <3 <3
My heart is with you GOOG! XOXOXOXO
How long until the free gourmet meals are nixed? Dot Com 2.0, we hardly knew ya!
@nobuggin: Overlooked TAC. Yeah. Dumbass move.
Working here added 20 lbs to my once tight waistline! I wish Goog made us pay for food or changed the 100-foot rule (distance separating any one of us from food or snack stations) so we'd all stop eating so damn much!
@yhoonomore: We're no Google cheerleaders here. Carlson has been duly flogged for missing the traffic-acquisition costs. For those just now tuning in, Yahoo excludes TAC -- payments made to publishers to carry its ads -- while Google includes them. Analysts subtract them out of Google's figures when making their estimates, which can lead to confusion when they're compared with Google's official numbers.
If Google is Duran Duran of high-tech, who would Yahoo be?
The Smiths?
@BartKela: Howard Jones?
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?